Some time ago, a major platform publicly disclosed abnormal operations of the OM project — using a combination of pump and dump, collateral lending, and market manipulation to profit. The method was exactly the same as what XVS once did on a leading exchange back in the day.
Interestingly, that exchange bore the losses themselves back then. Now, this platform has come out claiming to have evidence and threatening to report illegal activities to regulatory authorities — implying that retail investors’ losses will not be compensated.
But here’s a frustrating issue: in contract trading, sudden price spikes and especially the kind of "1011-style" disconnection operations that cut the internet cable, make it impossible for retail investors to close their positions. Who can retail investors turn to for complaints about these incidents? Will regulators actually intervene?
Fortunately, that leading exchange had a bit of conscience at the time and launched a mutual aid compensation program. Otherwise, retail investors would have been completely wiped out.
When the exchange itself suffers losses, it screams for regulation, but when retail investors are exploited, they can only bear it themselves — this double standard is truly disheartening.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WagmiOrRekt
· 12-16 01:27
Double standards are really unbelievable. When exchanges get into trouble, they blame regulators; when retail investors get liquidated, they say it's their own risk to bear. Is that it?
View OriginalReply0
NotGonnaMakeIt
· 12-13 10:25
This is the exchange's usual double standards again—complain when they lose, but turn a blind eye when retail investors suffer huge losses.
View OriginalReply0
notSatoshi1971
· 12-13 06:51
Here we go again with this? After the exchange scams people, they shift the blame to regulators, leaving retail investors with nothing and just having to accept their bad luck.
View OriginalReply0
ContractSurrender
· 12-13 06:45
It's the same old story. When the exchange gets into trouble, they blame regulation. Retail investors get liquidated and suffer losses? They can only accept their bad luck—it's hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainTherapist
· 12-13 06:41
It's the same old trick again. After the platform scams retail investors, they blame regulators. It's outrageous.
Some time ago, a major platform publicly disclosed abnormal operations of the OM project — using a combination of pump and dump, collateral lending, and market manipulation to profit. The method was exactly the same as what XVS once did on a leading exchange back in the day.
Interestingly, that exchange bore the losses themselves back then. Now, this platform has come out claiming to have evidence and threatening to report illegal activities to regulatory authorities — implying that retail investors’ losses will not be compensated.
But here’s a frustrating issue: in contract trading, sudden price spikes and especially the kind of "1011-style" disconnection operations that cut the internet cable, make it impossible for retail investors to close their positions. Who can retail investors turn to for complaints about these incidents? Will regulators actually intervene?
Fortunately, that leading exchange had a bit of conscience at the time and launched a mutual aid compensation program. Otherwise, retail investors would have been completely wiped out.
When the exchange itself suffers losses, it screams for regulation, but when retail investors are exploited, they can only bear it themselves — this double standard is truly disheartening.