Russia's Central Bank has initiated legal action against Belgium-based depository Euroclear in Moscow, seeking resolution over frozen assets. This lawsuit highlights escalating tensions around cross-border financial infrastructure and asset custody. For crypto traders and investors, the case underscores critical questions about asset protection in an increasingly fragmented global financial landscape. When major financial institutions face asset freezing and legal disputes, it reshapes confidence in traditional custody solutions and reinforces the importance of understanding counterparty risks across different platforms and jurisdictions.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeCryer
· 12-12 17:49
Now it's settled, traditional finance has also started to play the game of frozen assets. What is there to talk about decentralization?
View OriginalReply0
Rugman_Walking
· 12-12 17:48
Damn, centralized custody really can't keep up now. Self-custody is the way to go.
View OriginalReply0
RugDocScientist
· 12-12 17:41
Frozen funds dispute... This is exactly why I’ve always said not to store your coins in the exchange’s vault. Self-custody is the way to go.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseVagabond
· 12-12 17:39
The matter between the Russian Central Bank and Euroclear seems to indicate that traditional finance is also starting to perform asset freeze dramas. In our crypto circle, this kind of risk management appears to be more transparent.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-beba108d
· 12-12 17:39
Now Russia is at odds with Euroclear, and having assets frozen is really upsetting. Ultimately, centralized custody is too fragile.
Russia's Central Bank has initiated legal action against Belgium-based depository Euroclear in Moscow, seeking resolution over frozen assets. This lawsuit highlights escalating tensions around cross-border financial infrastructure and asset custody. For crypto traders and investors, the case underscores critical questions about asset protection in an increasingly fragmented global financial landscape. When major financial institutions face asset freezing and legal disputes, it reshapes confidence in traditional custody solutions and reinforces the importance of understanding counterparty risks across different platforms and jurisdictions.