【CryptoWorld】A well-known Launchpad platform recently sparked community discussion after its token price experienced a significant drop following the TGE (Token Generation Event). The platform issued a statement clarifying that the token’s performance on and after the launch day is entirely at the discretion of the project team, including fundraising scale, token economic model design, initial liquidity allocation, and other aspects, which are unrelated to the platform.
Does this sound a bit unfamiliar? Actually, it’s quite simple. The platform’s role is to provide infrastructure—hosting InfoFi activities, building user engagement frameworks, and rewarding community forces that genuinely generate attention for the project, produce quality content, and build project awareness. In other words, the platform does not touch the treasury, does not participate in pricing, and cannot control the post-listing trajectory.
Honestly, the current crypto market is indeed experiencing extremely tight liquidity. Heavy selling and price volatility are completely beyond expectations—this isn’t a problem with any particular platform or project, but a painful phase that the entire market is going through. However, there have always been voices in the community claiming “platforms are earning huge profits while retail investors suffer huge losses,” but such claims don’t hold up under scrutiny. The platforms have not chosen to remain silent in the face of such doubts—they’ve been listening carefully to community feedback. After each token launch, they summarize lessons learned and continuously improve mechanisms and processes. You should be aware of their attitude.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasWaster
· 12-15 12:37
You're blaming us again, haha, as if it's not our problem when something goes wrong.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropATM
· 12-15 11:44
Another excuse of "we are just tools" to shift blame, tired of hearing it
---
Can liquidity crunch explain the sharp decline? Then why not talk about the initial pricing being so outrageous
---
Alright, anyway, the retail investors will be cut as usual, who cares whose fault it is
---
So you're saying that if the project team designs poorly, the platform can walk away unscathed? That's pretty harsh
---
Blaming the market every day, but why is it that during a bull market no one says it's the market's credit
---
Playing the information gap skillfully, anyway retail investors just get stuck with the losses
---
Just talking without touching the vault? What about during fundraising, you must have already pocketed the difference
View OriginalReply0
0xSoulless
· 12-13 21:19
They're passing the buck again, classic case. The platform simply provides the infrastructure, and project teams make their own decisions... Sounds reasonable, but who the hell actually believes it? A bunch of retail investors have been wiped out, and every link in the chain says "not my problem," hilarious. Is liquidity crunch just an excuse? I think no one is willing to take the bailout.
View OriginalReply0
GasGrillMaster
· 12-12 13:10
Talking nonsense, blaming the market for liquidity crunch? If I had known it would turn out like this, I wouldn't have invested in any coins.
View OriginalReply0
MevHunter
· 12-12 13:05
Trying to shift blame again? That's funny. Just be honest about liquidity being tight, no need for all these empty excuses.
View OriginalReply0
staking_gramps
· 12-12 13:02
Here we go again with this excuse of shifting blame, who believes that the platform is just a pure tool?
---
Liquidity tight? I've seen through it long ago, project teams design bad coins and still blame the market.
---
So basically, the odds are too bad, and the retail investors should wake up.
---
Playing these word games every day, it's really interesting.
---
Launchpad supports you but doesn't take responsibility, this logic is truly clever.
---
Another big deflector, I'm getting tired of hearing it.
---
Raising new coins with insufficient initial liquidity? No wonder there's a dump.
---
This kind of talk is as good as saying nothing.
View OriginalReply0
AlgoAlchemist
· 12-12 13:02
Haha platform's excuse-making this time is just perfect. To be honest, it's still the project's own fault for messing up.
View OriginalReply0
IfIWereOnChain
· 12-12 12:59
Blaming others again? I'm tired of this excuse. Choosing coins with poor liquidity is what leads to this outcome.
Sounds nice, but isn't it just the project team shooting themselves in the foot? No one to blame but themselves.
Liquidity tight? Bro, are you saying the coin was dumped all at once? Stop beating around the bush.
This TGE was truly outstanding—platform distancing itself, project team passing the buck, and ultimately investors suffering huge losses.
Honestly, just reading this statement shows they lack confidence. The more they talk, the more problems arise.
Isn't this a classic case of "we only make money and don't take responsibility"?
Wait, can liquidity issues really explain a 50% drop? Why didn't other coins suffer as badly?
If the platform really had nothing to do with this, why did they feel the need to issue a statement?
I think, anyone who invests in this kind of Launchpad will be unlucky. Better to do thorough research oneself.
The problem isn't the platform or the project; it's that this broken market simply can't support itself.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-3824aa38
· 12-12 12:42
You're trying to shift blame again, how interesting.
Project team responds to token listing volatility: We are just a tool; market liquidity is the main player.
【CryptoWorld】A well-known Launchpad platform recently sparked community discussion after its token price experienced a significant drop following the TGE (Token Generation Event). The platform issued a statement clarifying that the token’s performance on and after the launch day is entirely at the discretion of the project team, including fundraising scale, token economic model design, initial liquidity allocation, and other aspects, which are unrelated to the platform.
Does this sound a bit unfamiliar? Actually, it’s quite simple. The platform’s role is to provide infrastructure—hosting InfoFi activities, building user engagement frameworks, and rewarding community forces that genuinely generate attention for the project, produce quality content, and build project awareness. In other words, the platform does not touch the treasury, does not participate in pricing, and cannot control the post-listing trajectory.
Honestly, the current crypto market is indeed experiencing extremely tight liquidity. Heavy selling and price volatility are completely beyond expectations—this isn’t a problem with any particular platform or project, but a painful phase that the entire market is going through. However, there have always been voices in the community claiming “platforms are earning huge profits while retail investors suffer huge losses,” but such claims don’t hold up under scrutiny. The platforms have not chosen to remain silent in the face of such doubts—they’ve been listening carefully to community feedback. After each token launch, they summarize lessons learned and continuously improve mechanisms and processes. You should be aware of their attitude.