2025-12-12 11:21:45

Looking at $PIPPIN's holdings data, the longs have accumulated over 20 million USD, while the shorts are just over 3 million USD — the gap is too huge.

Just from the numbers alone, the problem is evident. The long-short ratio is nearly 6:1. In this extremely unbalanced situation, the short side simply doesn't have enough ammunition to suppress the market. With such concentrated long forces in the market, imagine how much effort the short side would need to move the price.

Rather than sitting and waiting for death, it's better to join the long side. Anyway, from the perspective of position battles, the longs have the upper hand.

PIPPIN2.46%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LongTermDreamer

· 4h ago

I especially love hearing this kind of "history repeats itself" argument. Three years ago, I also thought this way about $BTC, and what happened? I got trapped for more than two years, haha. But on the other hand, a sixfold difference is indeed crazy, and the bears' ammunition is somewhat scarce. If this situation reverses, it will be quite interesting to watch.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterWang

· 12-12 11:51

A sixfold gap... This short position is really going to be crushed. No wonder the bulls have been so arrogant these past two days.

View OriginalReply0

AlphaLeaker

· 12-12 11:50

This long-short ratio is a bit outrageous. The shorts are so weak, and they still expect a rebound?

View OriginalReply0

FloorPriceWatcher

· 12-12 11:49

Wow, the long-short ratio is ridiculously skewed; the bears don't stand a chance with this amount of ammunition.

View OriginalReply0

Ser_APY_2000

· 12-12 11:49

Hmm... a 6x gap is quite exaggerated, but in times like this, it's easiest to get cut, brother.

View OriginalReply0

Layer3Dreamer

· 12-12 11:44

theoretically speaking, this 6:1 ratio thing is wild but like... isn't this exactly how liquidity pools collapse? the asymmetry screams recursive instability to me. if we actually map this onto cross-rollup state verification, you'd need exponential settlement costs just to rebalance. reminds me of vitalik's trilemma paper—concentration breeds fragility, not strength ngl

Reply0

BridgeJumper

· 12-12 11:35

A sixfold gap, this is obviously the bulls dominating the market step by step.

View OriginalReply0

QinZhu

· 12-12 11:24

How should I interpret a long-short ratio of around 0.3? It indicates that those shorting are doing three times as much as those going long. However, the large account long-short ratio is 1:1.

View OriginalReply0

· 12-12 11:23

So the cars are getting heavier, and there are more and more troops. In the end, who makes money and whose money do they earn?

View OriginalReply0

Trending TopicsView More
#GateNovTransparencyReportReleased
17.35K Popularity
#FedRateCutComing
681.08K Popularity
#PostonSquaretoEarn$50
65.09K Popularity
#BitcoinActivityPicksUp
17.64K Popularity
#CryptoMarketRebound
508.66K Popularity

Hot Gate FunView More

1
666拼好饭
MC:$3.58KHolders:1
0.00%
2
GWHALEGWhale
MC:$3.81KHolders:3
0.97%
3
BGOLDBGOLD
MC:$3.67KHolders:1
0.78%
4
HTBGHotBerg
MC:$3.7KHolders:2
0.02%
5
GBOYGBOY
MC:$3.71KHolders:2
0.04%

Sitemap