#数字资产生态回暖 From 3,200U to 185,000U: Why can some people steadily increase their account, while others keep blowing up their positions
I have seen too many traders who fail completely because they go all-in. A good old friend told me last October that he had already blown his account twice, with only 3,200U left, and wanted to try his luck one last time. I didn’t give him false hope, only advised him to follow a complete position sizing model plus a rolling position rhythm.
In the first two months, there weren’t any remarkable gains, but he did the hardest part: strictly taking profits and cutting losses on every trade. Starting from the third month, his account began to accelerate. By the 92nd day, the account surpassed 185,000U. Throughout the process, he never once went all-in or experienced a major drawdown.
This is not an isolated case. I’ve validated this method of "rolling positions + position control + rhythm recognition" in the market for an entire year:
Some started with 4,800U and reached 76,000U in less than 60 days. Others began with 700U and grew to 19,000U, achieving low-risk compounding with small capital. There are also traders who, after three consecutive months of losses, used this strategy to bounce back and never blew up their accounts again.
This method boils down to three principles:
**Position size is the lifeline**: No single position exceeds 20% of the total account, and stop-losses are kept within 3%. This isn’t conservatism, but a strategy to survive longer in highly volatile markets.
**Only follow the continuation of the main trend**: Do not trade in sideways ranges, avoid reacting to news volatility, only take trades after technical breakouts with clear risk-reward ratios. Most blow-ups occur because traders enter at garbage levels.
**Weekly review to build high-probability setups**: Record profits and losses, reasons for entries and exits every week, find your high-probability trading routines, then repeat them. This is the only way to shift from speculation to a systematic approach.
What’s the most common mistake for those with limited capital? Going all-in, doubling down after losses, chasing after gains. Constant trial and error keeps the account from ever turning positive. It’s not that you don’t have opportunities; you just haven’t built a system that allows capital to compound.
I never encourage gambling-like reversals. But I am very clear: as long as you avoid blowing up your account, it will naturally have the chance to grow.
If you still have 2,000U or 3,000U now and don’t want to take more detours, consider diligently following this method for three months. No need to chase hot topics every day, no need to frequently change coins—just control your positions and follow the rhythm. The market isn’t lacking opportunities; what you’re missing is a stable profit-generating system.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FOMOSapien
· 12-13 02:08
Honestly, I've seen too many cases of full-position liquidation, it's just that I can't control my hand.
185,000 sounds great, but the key is whether that 3% stop-loss can be protected; most people can't do it.
View OriginalReply0
HashRateHustler
· 12-12 07:08
Really? The idea of stop-loss is easy to say but too hard to do.
---
Go all in, add when you lose, chase after gains... That's exactly how I got 🔥.
---
The key is whether you can stick through the boring two months. Most people have already given up.
---
The 20% position limit is a hard-earned lesson.
---
I just want to know how many people can really stick to weekly reviews. Frankly, it's a matter of discipline.
---
Small U to big U is not a dream, but the prerequisite is that you have to survive until that day.
---
The only prerequisite for the account to run smoothly is: don't get liquidated. Sounds simple, right?
---
That method doesn't sound like any black technology, just steady... but no one believes that being steady is the most profitable.
---
Going from 3,200 to 185,000, if I hadn't seen it myself, I wouldn't believe it could be so steady.
---
The problem is, in a volatile zone, you really can't afford to lose, but when you're careless, you just can't stop.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOSapien
· 12-12 07:07
Basically, it's just a lack of discipline. How many times have I blown up by going all-in, and I still can't learn my lesson.
The 20% position size thing sounds simple, but very few people actually follow through with it.
View OriginalReply0
GoldDiggerDuck
· 12-12 06:57
Really, going all-in is a dead end.
---
58 times in 92 days? I’d be surprised if I believed that.
---
That’s right, most people can’t get past the hurdle of stop-loss.
---
Here comes the套路 of selling courses again...
---
Position management is truly the only way to survive, I have no rebuttal.
---
Watching these wealth-rebuilding stories every day, but I still find myself in a liquidation cycle.
---
I agree with the weekly review part, but most people’s writings are just a waste of effort.
---
Heard of the concept of rolling positions, but no one has truly executed it to the end.
---
Not getting liquidated is winning—that’s the most straightforward way to put it.
---
From 3200 to 185,000... probability statements are always quite eye-catching.
---
I just want to ask, why doesn’t this system simply let you use a small account to compound to several million?
---
The prerequisite for small capital turnaround is surviving the first three months, that’s the real challenge.
---
Sounds nice in theory, but once you hit a limit down, everything’s over.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroEnjoyer
· 12-12 06:51
It's too true, a full-position mindset is really a account killer.
---
It sounds beautiful, but how much mental resilience does it take to execute...
---
I admit that a 3% stop-loss limit is necessary; surviving longer is more important than quick account turnaround.
---
The problem is most people can't endure the first two months; if there's no profit, they start to doubt.
---
Rolling positions sounds simple, but in actual operation, who can strictly follow it every time?
---
I've heard quite a few theories about this system, but how many people stick to it?
---
The key is still mindset—being patient and not greedy or anxious is really more valuable than any technique.
---
Turning small funds around isn't impossible; it all depends on whether you can withstand the psychological hurdle.
---
Brother, your words hit the point—avoiding liquidation is winning.
---
Weekly review is indeed a habit that needs to be developed; otherwise, it's all in vain.
View OriginalReply0
NewDAOdreamer
· 12-12 06:47
Honestly, going all-in like this really pushes oneself to the brink of despair. I've seen too many people exit the market directly because of this.
#数字资产生态回暖 From 3,200U to 185,000U: Why can some people steadily increase their account, while others keep blowing up their positions
I have seen too many traders who fail completely because they go all-in. A good old friend told me last October that he had already blown his account twice, with only 3,200U left, and wanted to try his luck one last time. I didn’t give him false hope, only advised him to follow a complete position sizing model plus a rolling position rhythm.
In the first two months, there weren’t any remarkable gains, but he did the hardest part: strictly taking profits and cutting losses on every trade. Starting from the third month, his account began to accelerate. By the 92nd day, the account surpassed 185,000U. Throughout the process, he never once went all-in or experienced a major drawdown.
This is not an isolated case. I’ve validated this method of "rolling positions + position control + rhythm recognition" in the market for an entire year:
Some started with 4,800U and reached 76,000U in less than 60 days. Others began with 700U and grew to 19,000U, achieving low-risk compounding with small capital. There are also traders who, after three consecutive months of losses, used this strategy to bounce back and never blew up their accounts again.
This method boils down to three principles:
**Position size is the lifeline**: No single position exceeds 20% of the total account, and stop-losses are kept within 3%. This isn’t conservatism, but a strategy to survive longer in highly volatile markets.
**Only follow the continuation of the main trend**: Do not trade in sideways ranges, avoid reacting to news volatility, only take trades after technical breakouts with clear risk-reward ratios. Most blow-ups occur because traders enter at garbage levels.
**Weekly review to build high-probability setups**: Record profits and losses, reasons for entries and exits every week, find your high-probability trading routines, then repeat them. This is the only way to shift from speculation to a systematic approach.
What’s the most common mistake for those with limited capital? Going all-in, doubling down after losses, chasing after gains. Constant trial and error keeps the account from ever turning positive. It’s not that you don’t have opportunities; you just haven’t built a system that allows capital to compound.
I never encourage gambling-like reversals. But I am very clear: as long as you avoid blowing up your account, it will naturally have the chance to grow.
If you still have 2,000U or 3,000U now and don’t want to take more detours, consider diligently following this method for three months. No need to chase hot topics every day, no need to frequently change coins—just control your positions and follow the rhythm. The market isn’t lacking opportunities; what you’re missing is a stable profit-generating system.