Pacifica platform reveals a divine strategy: turning 60,000 in principal into 540 million in trading volume and earning 110,000?

Question

[BitPush] Recently, a rather wild strategy has emerged on the Pacifica platform—earning points through high-frequency trading while making money. One trader used only about $60,000 in principal and managed to generate $540 million in trading volume in 30 days, which is a 9000-fold increase over the principal. Even more astonishing, this guy not only boosted volume but also steadily increased his account profit by $115,000.

The operational logic is actually not complicated: Pacifica now has a points incentive program, where the more you trade, the more points you earn. But the key is to do high-frequency trading while maintaining your principal or even turning a profit. This trader has recently ranked among the top three in trading volume on the platform for both 7 and 30 days, with the capital curve continuously rising, proving that this strategy really works.

If you want to try this approach, there is now an AI-driven on-chain copy trading tool called Coinbob that has a dedicated Pacifica version. It allows you to directly copy the actions of top traders, earning trading profits while accumulating platform points for airdrops. The tool also supports copying addresses on the Hyperliquid chain, covering a broad range. Of course, copy trading involves risks, so you should understand the strategy logic before jumping in.

LucidSleepwalker · Accepted Answer

60,000 to earn 540 million in trading volume? How should I interpret this number...

Wait, stable profit of 115,000? I need to think about this logic some more.

Making money through fake orders is always a dream; don’t be blinded by the data.

I want to ask whether this has really been implemented or is just an isolated case?

Pacifica's recent incentives are quite aggressive, but what about the risks?

High-frequency volume manipulation for profit... I don't believe it's that simple.

Here comes another tool promotion, always claiming it's a specialized version, a specialized version.

JustAnotherWallet · Answer

60,000 to earn 540 million? How much do you have to刷? I feel like the risk is buried here.

---

Wait, is this really stable profit or just pure luck? I need to look at his drawdown curve.

---

Another divine strategy, it should be over next month.

---

This guy really figured out how to play points arbitrage, but can it be sustained?

---

9,000x volume sounds incredible, but wow, it did make money.

---

Pacifica's recent incentives are a bit extreme, but I still have reservations about the copy trading tool.

StopLossMaster · Answer

60,000 times 9,000x trading volume? Is this data real or fake? It seems a bit unbelievable.

Wait, earning 115,000—is it real money? Or is it just points?

Pacifica's recent incentives are pretty aggressive, but can high-frequency order stuffing really guarantee profits? I'm a bit skeptical.

Did this guy stumble upon some bug? How come everything's going so smoothly?

To be honest, it looks great, but the risks are definitely not small.

Deconstructionist · Answer

60,000 to earn 540 million? No matter how you look at it, this number seems unbelievable. Who would believe it?

Wait, did I really make 115,000? Then I need to study this logic carefully.

The Pacifica incentives are real, but the question is, what about the risks? Talk about how to handle the losses.

High-frequency volume boosting sounds like a sign of pump and dump; beware of getting trapped.

This tactic feels like gambling; probability theory tells me that looking back, it's all survivor bias.

But if it really works out, then it’s worth trying... the key is having enough capital to support it.

MEVictim · Answer

Damn, 60,000 to make 540 million in trading volume? Is this data really accurate? It feels a bit suspicious.

And this can still guarantee a profit of 110,000? How did you do it? Tell me.

Wait, isn't this another scheme to harvest naive investors?

Platform points incentives and similar tricks I’ve seen plenty of, but in the end, you still have to step back.

Feels like someone is just telling a story. Can you review the trading logic?

This strategy sounds a bit gambling-like.

Profit protection with high frequency? Easy to say, but you'll only realize how hard it is when you try.

Pacifica has become popular recently, with new manipulative tactics.

But on the other hand, if it’s really that profitable, why share it?