I went through BTC’s historical data and found an interesting pattern—the price tends to hover in a high range every time long-term holders capitulate on a large scale.
The routines in previous cycles were pretty clear: old holders sell at a loss and exit, and the amount of BTC on exchanges spikes. What does this mean? The real long-term holders are cashing out at the top and leaving. This signal has never failed in the past—whenever these people start selling in large numbers, Bitcoin’s local top is usually near.
But this cycle isn’t following the script at all. Even though on-chain data shows a decrease in coins held by long-term holders, the weird thing is that exchange balances are also dropping at the same time. That doesn’t add up—if it’s not the old players selling, then who’s actually offloading their coins?
A more reasonable explanation is: long-term holders aren’t moving at all; instead, exchanges are being forced to dip into their own reserves to maintain liquidity because there’s not enough selling pressure in the market. So on paper, it looks like long-term holders are retreating, but in reality, it might be the exchanges “bleeding out.”
Based on historical experience, when this kind of data appears, BTC should be rising, but now it’s falling. That leaves only two possibilities:
Either this data model that’s worked for over a decade has completely failed; Or, we’re in a special phase like what happened in 2021.
Looking back at 2021, after the March 12 crash, there was a similar red alert area, and then the market dragged on until July before it really rebounded. If this time is following the same script, then we might be in the darkest hour just before dawn.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ForkThisDAO
· 22h ago
From the perspective of exchange bleeding, I really hadn't thought of that, and it's quite frightening upon reflection.
This wave of abnormal data is indeed a bit outrageous; whether it's a model failure or just the dark before dawn, we have to bet on one of the two.
Can the script after 312 be replayed? It feels like this cycle isn't quite the same.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinAnxiety
· 12-09 18:56
Exchanges are bleeding, huh? That's a bit of a fresh angle... But when it comes to historical patterns failing, I'm more inclined to believe the second possibility. After all, I went through that 2021 wave myself, and I remember just how tough it was.
View OriginalReply0
memecoin_therapy
· 12-09 18:52
Wait, the exchanges are bleeding? That logic is wild. Doesn't that mean we're actually seeing a bottom signal now?
Someone should have backtested this data model ages ago—it feels like every cycle gets wrecked by it.
If this really is a repeat of 2021, I would have already bought the dip ages ago. What am I even waiting for?
It's true that the model isn't working now. On-chain data and market trends are moving in completely opposite directions. It's honestly absurd.
That darkest moment before dawn really is unbearable. Every time people say that, but then it still drops for another month.
Long-term holders aren't moving? Well, they're just not moving then. It's not like I can run away either.
Exchanges are using up their reserves to maintain liquidity? So that means institutions are holding up the market? All the more reason for me to accumulate coins.
View OriginalReply0
StableBoi
· 12-09 18:45
Are exchanges bleeding? That's an interesting logic, but on-chain data can sometimes be misleading, right?
It feels like the 2021 playbook might not apply now.
BTC is acting a bit crazy this round. All the signals for a rise are here, but it's still dropping. I really don't get it.
Could it be that historical patterns have really stopped working? That's a bit scary to think about.
Wait, you said long-term holders haven't moved, so where exactly is this wave of selling pressure coming from?
View OriginalReply0
ProbablyNothing
· 12-09 18:45
Wait, the exchanges are bleeding? That’s actually a good sign—it means the real whales aren’t selling.
The historical models have failed, maybe the pattern really is different this time.
Do we have to wait until July again? My mentality is breaking down.
If long-term holders aren’t moving, then who’s dumping to cause such a drop?
After 3/12, it only took off in July—does that mean we’ll have to tough it out for a few more months this time too? Maybe I should just calm down for now.
Is the data lying to us? Or am I understanding it wrong?
Reasonable suspicion that exchanges are piling up fake liquidity to fleece the last batch of bagholders.
This logic chain feels a bit far-fetched—feels like I’m just looking for some psychological comfort.
I’ve heard “it’s darkest before the dawn” a hundred times, but everyone who said that has already sold at a loss.
View OriginalReply0
ChainMemeDealer
· 12-09 18:45
Wait, the exchange is bleeding? I need to think about this logic again.
Old retail investors aren’t moving and new ones don’t dare to move either, so who’s dumping the market...
Why does this round of data feel reversed? By the usual pattern, BTC should have taken off by now.
That period in 2021 was really tough, but will it be the same this time? I kind of doubt it.
Anyway, I can’t make sense of it now, so I’ll just wait and see.
I went through BTC’s historical data and found an interesting pattern—the price tends to hover in a high range every time long-term holders capitulate on a large scale.
The routines in previous cycles were pretty clear: old holders sell at a loss and exit, and the amount of BTC on exchanges spikes. What does this mean? The real long-term holders are cashing out at the top and leaving. This signal has never failed in the past—whenever these people start selling in large numbers, Bitcoin’s local top is usually near.
But this cycle isn’t following the script at all. Even though on-chain data shows a decrease in coins held by long-term holders, the weird thing is that exchange balances are also dropping at the same time. That doesn’t add up—if it’s not the old players selling, then who’s actually offloading their coins?
A more reasonable explanation is: long-term holders aren’t moving at all; instead, exchanges are being forced to dip into their own reserves to maintain liquidity because there’s not enough selling pressure in the market. So on paper, it looks like long-term holders are retreating, but in reality, it might be the exchanges “bleeding out.”
Based on historical experience, when this kind of data appears, BTC should be rising, but now it’s falling. That leaves only two possibilities:
Either this data model that’s worked for over a decade has completely failed;
Or, we’re in a special phase like what happened in 2021.
Looking back at 2021, after the March 12 crash, there was a similar red alert area, and then the market dragged on until July before it really rebounded. If this time is following the same script, then we might be in the darkest hour just before dawn.