[Chain News] Jonathan Gould, the head of the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), recently dropped a bombshell at a blockchain conference—crypto companies seeking federal banking licenses should no longer be treated differently.
His logic is straightforward: digital asset custody is essentially just electronic safekeeping services, something traditional banks have been doing for decades. Why should it be seen differently when it comes to blockchain? When fintech companies apply for a national trust bank license, they’re essentially running new businesses within the existing framework, so there’s no need to confine the banking industry to last-generation technology.
Gould also emphasized that the banking system is fully capable of leaping from the telegraph era to the blockchain era. The data is interesting too—just this year, the OCC has received 14 new bank charter applications, several of them from digital asset companies, a number nearly equal to the total over the past four years.
The core of his viewpoint boils down to this: if you want to use licensing to help the banking industry keep pace with modern finance and better serve the real economy, you need to provide digital asset-related companies with a legitimate federal regulatory pathway—stop holding them back with outdated rules.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LayerZeroEnjoyer
· 12-12 00:48
Someone finally dares to say this. If the regulators wake up, there is hope.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamer
· 12-11 11:41
Wait, traditional banks can also custody digital assets? This logic still feels a bit forced to me.
View OriginalReply0
degenonymous
· 12-11 04:34
Well said, finally an official person dares to speak the truth. The old facade of traditional finance certainly needs to be replaced.
View OriginalReply0
OvertimeSquid
· 12-09 03:30
Finally, someone dares to say it. The traditional banking system has long been overdue for an upgrade.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotDayLaborer
· 12-09 02:42
Someone finally said it—those old banking rules really do need to change.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSage
· 12-09 02:42
Starting to ease policies again? The last bastion of traditional finance is about to fall too.
View OriginalReply0
BackrowObserver
· 12-09 02:42
Wait, this logic is a bit forced. Is blockchain custody really the same as traditional custody? The risks are completely different, come on.
View OriginalReply0
failed_dev_successful_ape
· 12-09 02:38
Wait, is this logic really valid? Is digital asset custody just electronic safekeeping? They might seem similar, but the risk models are completely different. Can the frameworks that traditional banks have used for decades really be directly applied to blockchain? It feels a bit presumptuous to me.
View OriginalReply0
ForumMiningMaster
· 12-09 02:22
This is really getting interesting—OCC isn’t pretending anymore and just spoke up directly. I have to admit, this logic is impressive.
US OCC Chief Speaks Out: Crypto Companies Applying for Bank Licenses Should Not Be Discriminated Against, New Rules Needed in the Blockchain Era
[Chain News] Jonathan Gould, the head of the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), recently dropped a bombshell at a blockchain conference—crypto companies seeking federal banking licenses should no longer be treated differently.
His logic is straightforward: digital asset custody is essentially just electronic safekeeping services, something traditional banks have been doing for decades. Why should it be seen differently when it comes to blockchain? When fintech companies apply for a national trust bank license, they’re essentially running new businesses within the existing framework, so there’s no need to confine the banking industry to last-generation technology.
Gould also emphasized that the banking system is fully capable of leaping from the telegraph era to the blockchain era. The data is interesting too—just this year, the OCC has received 14 new bank charter applications, several of them from digital asset companies, a number nearly equal to the total over the past four years.
The core of his viewpoint boils down to this: if you want to use licensing to help the banking industry keep pace with modern finance and better serve the real economy, you need to provide digital asset-related companies with a legitimate federal regulatory pathway—stop holding them back with outdated rules.