So I gave AI-powered photography a shot last weekend, and honestly? The output blew my mind. Fed it some basic prompts about lighting and composition—nothing fancy—and what came back looked like it was shot by someone who actually knows what they're doing with a camera. The detail work, the color grading, even the depth of field felt intentional. Not gonna lie, part of me wonders if traditional photo editing is about to have a serious competitor. Anyone else experimenting with this tech?

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MelonFieldvip
· 6h ago
Traditional photographers are going to lose their jobs again. This time, it’s no joke.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightSnapHuntervip
· 12-04 06:33
NGL, this thing is actually pretty impressive, but I still don't think it can replace real photographic vision.
View OriginalReply0
ProbablyNothingvip
· 12-04 06:29
ngl this thing is a bit scary... feels like photographers are really going to lose their jobs
View OriginalReply0
SerumSquirtervip
· 12-04 06:23
ngl this thing is really amazing, but it feels like real photographers' livelihoods might be at risk.
View OriginalReply0
WalletManagervip
· 12-04 06:10
I need to point out the risk factor with AI-generated images—looks impressive, but you have to consider the loopholes in copyright agreements. Can this stuff even be audited?
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmivip
· 12-04 06:04
ngl this thing is indeed a bit scary, photographers' jobs might not be safe anymore
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)