CryptoDAO (v3 PRO) associated team historical record reminder
With the recent increase in exposure of CryptoDAO (v3 PRO) on social media platforms and groups, the following is an objective review of the three projects previously led by the team, for community reference:
1. AKAS Initially focused on 1:1 value anchoring and fair minting, but multiple large issuances with zero fees appeared on-chain, followed by concentrated selling during periods of shallow trading depth, causing the token price to quickly drop to zero.
2. OLY It claims to have completely renounced ownership to the outside world, but in reality, it retains hidden permissions that can adjust tax rates and functions at any time. The relevant backdoors have been confirmed one by one in subsequent audits and on-chain calls.
3. LynkCoDAO Issue millions of tokens in a single transaction through a single address without prior notice, immediately transfer the treasury assets after the minting is completed, and carry out a large-scale sell-off in a short period of time.
These three projects are operated by the same core team, and their paths are highly similar: they all promote "thorough decentralization" and "everlasting community treasury" as selling points, yet they always retain actual control and have never made a public, verifiable account of the assets from previous projects.
Currently, although v3 PRO appears in an upgraded version, the team composition, contract audit partners, and promotional framework remain highly consistent with previous versions. It is recommended that interested participants first verify through browsers such as Etherscan/BscScan, focusing on whether the contract has truly renounced, whether the treasury is multi-signature, and whether there are any unusual transaction records in historical addresses.
Any investment decision should rely on on-chain data; safeguarding assets is more reliable than any narrative.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
CryptoDAO (v3 PRO) associated team historical record reminder
With the recent increase in exposure of CryptoDAO (v3 PRO) on social media platforms and groups, the following is an objective review of the three projects previously led by the team, for community reference:
1. AKAS
Initially focused on 1:1 value anchoring and fair minting, but multiple large issuances with zero fees appeared on-chain, followed by concentrated selling during periods of shallow trading depth, causing the token price to quickly drop to zero.
2. OLY
It claims to have completely renounced ownership to the outside world, but in reality, it retains hidden permissions that can adjust tax rates and functions at any time. The relevant backdoors have been confirmed one by one in subsequent audits and on-chain calls.
3. LynkCoDAO
Issue millions of tokens in a single transaction through a single address without prior notice, immediately transfer the treasury assets after the minting is completed, and carry out a large-scale sell-off in a short period of time.
These three projects are operated by the same core team, and their paths are highly similar: they all promote "thorough decentralization" and "everlasting community treasury" as selling points, yet they always retain actual control and have never made a public, verifiable account of the assets from previous projects.
Currently, although v3 PRO appears in an upgraded version, the team composition, contract audit partners, and promotional framework remain highly consistent with previous versions. It is recommended that interested participants first verify through browsers such as Etherscan/BscScan, focusing on whether the contract has truly renounced, whether the treasury is multi-signature, and whether there are any unusual transaction records in historical addresses.
Any investment decision should rely on on-chain data; safeguarding assets is more reliable than any narrative.