Recently, I have observed a phenomenon: when a certain asset experiences significant Unfavourable Information, some people's first reaction is not to execute their own risk management plan, but rather to ask everywhere, "What does the teacher think?" "What should we do now?"

To be honest, this kind of dependency mentality is quite dangerous.

Before opening a position, no stop-loss level is set, and only after a sudden crash do we think to ask others for strategies—who can save you at that moment? Once unfavourable information is released, liquidity evaporates instantly, and by the time it is interpreted, it is already too late. Moreover, openly discussing the specific assets' unfavourable information will instead exacerbate panic emotions, leading to a secondary sell-off.

When making money, you think you're a trading genius, but when you lose money, you blame others for not reminding you? What about the principle of diversification? What about the discipline of stop-loss? These are not the first time you've encountered them, and you will encounter them repeatedly in the future.

Once again, I emphasize:
I never comment on the unfavourable information or favourable information of individual assets; I only analyze the track and direction. But there is one iron rule - you must set a stop-loss level before building a position. This stop-loss line is your last line of defense when you encounter sudden unfavourable information.

Unfavourable Information cannot be "interpreted", because the interpretation itself will amplify panic; favourable information does not need me to call the shots, the market will provide the answer.

Trading requires independent thinking abilities, not a nanny-style service. If you can't stand this logic, just unfollow.