
A liquidity provider refers to an individual or institution that injects capital into a market.
This involves supplying assets to an exchange or protocol, enabling others to trade or borrow seamlessly. A common approach is depositing two tokens into an AMM (Automated Market Maker) liquidity pool or placing buy and sell orders on an order book exchange to provide market depth, earning trading fees and platform incentives in return. Associated risks include asset ratio changes due to price fluctuations and what’s known as “impermanent loss” in AMMs.
Liquidity providers are vital to making crypto markets efficient and tradable. The more liquidity in the market, the smoother the trading experience, with reduced volatility and better price discovery for users.
For individuals or institutions, becoming a liquidity provider offers a “semi-passive” income stream through trading fee sharing and token rewards. However, this is not a risk-free yield: asset price changes, improper strategy settings, or low pool trading volumes can reduce returns or even lead to losses.
For project teams, attracting liquidity providers early increases the tradability of their tokens, reduces slippage (the difference between executed and expected prices), and supports both price discovery and user growth.
In AMMs, prices are set by the ratio of two assets in a pool. By depositing both assets, you earn a share of the trading fees generated by each transaction, proportional to your contribution. This algorithm-driven market making—called AMM—does not rely on manual order placement.
A key risk in AMMs is impermanent loss. When the two assets’ prices diverge significantly, withdrawing your funds based on the pool’s current ratio may yield less value than simply holding the assets. The loss is “impermanent” because if prices revert to their original levels, the loss can disappear.
Recently, “concentrated liquidity” has become popular: you can allocate capital within a specific price range—like setting up shop only in the busiest part of a marketplace. This increases capital efficiency and may concentrate fee earnings, but if prices move outside your range, you stop earning fees until you adjust your position or widen your range.
On order book exchanges, liquidity providers maintain buy and sell orders (either manually or via bots), keeping a spread and inventory to earn fees or capture price differences. Compared to AMMs, this method requires more advanced strategies and risk management.
LPs are most commonly seen on DEXs (decentralized exchanges) like Uniswap or Curve, providing trading depth to earn fees. For stablecoin pairs (e.g., USDC/USDT), price volatility is low and fee income is more predictable; for volatile pairs (e.g., ETH/USDC), potential fees are higher but so is impermanent loss.
In lending protocols, liquidity providers supply assets for others to borrow and earn interest. While different from AMMs, this is still broadly classified as liquidity provision—placing funds in a pool for others’ use.
On Gate, for example, products like “liquidity mining” are available. You can select a trading pair (such as BTC/USDT) in the spot market and add equal-value assets as liquidity. Earnings come from trading fees based on transaction volume and potentially extra platform rewards. Your position rebalances automatically as prices change, so you need to monitor your range and allocation periodically.
In derivatives markets, some protocols require liquidity providers to post collateral or supply funding for perpetual contracts, earning funding rates or maker rebates. However, these carry more complex risks and mechanisms that require caution.
Over the past year, concentrated liquidity on major DEXs has become the dominant approach, with LPs increasingly allocating capital within high-volume price ranges for better efficiency.
As of Q3 2024, total value locked (TVL) in DeFi hovers in the tens of billions USD (source: DefiLlama). With market recovery, stablecoin pools and Ethereum-related pools have seen increased activity.
Ethereum liquid staking token (LST) pools remain strong; Lido holds around 30% market share (sources: Dune & Ethereum staking data, Q3 2024). The stETH/ETH pool on Curve consistently maintains high TVL, reaching billions per pool (Q3 2024), with LP earnings increasingly dependent on volume and fee structure.
For fee returns, stablecoin pairs typically yield annualized fee rates in the low to mid double digits (source: DEX pool pages & community stats, full year 2024). More protocols now use “points/airdrop expectations” as LP incentives—actual realized yield should account for potential uncertainty in these rewards.
Another emerging focus is MEV and price routing optimization. More trading interfaces now support MEV protection and batch matching—indirectly benefiting LPs by ensuring cleaner transaction flows and reducing slippage and losses from frontrunning (full year 2024).
Both roles aim to facilitate market trading, but use different approaches. Liquidity providers deposit funds into public pools and earn fees proportionally; market makers actively place buy/sell orders on order books, adjusting parameters and managing inventory to profit from spreads and rebates.
In AMMs, LPs do not need to continuously update quotes—the algorithm sets prices based on pool balances. On centralized exchanges, market makers must update orders constantly according to market conditions, bearing inventory risk and operational costs.
The risk-return profile also differs: LPs primarily face impermanent loss and range inefficiency; their rewards come from fees and incentives. Market makers risk having quotes hit by adverse moves or suffering large inventory losses; their profits come from spreads and rebates. Many institutions play both roles but use distinct strategies and tools for each.
Getting started as a liquidity provider is straightforward: First, register an account on an exchange like Gate and complete any required verification steps. Then navigate to the liquidity mining or trading pair page, select your desired pair, deposit equal values of both tokens (1:1 ratio), and the system will issue you LP tokens as proof of your position. Once you provide liquidity, you’ll start earning a share of trading fees plus any platform rewards.
Impermanent loss is the main risk for liquidity providers. It occurs when prices of the two assets in your pair diverge; your final return may be less than simply holding both tokens—sometimes resulting in losses. For example: If you deposit $100 worth of tokens A and B at a 1:1 ratio and A rises sharply while B falls, your holdings will be auto-rebalanced by the system. Even after collecting fees, you may not fully offset the price difference loss. Choosing low-volatility pairs or stablecoins helps minimize this risk.
Liquidity provider returns mainly come from two sources: trading fee sharing and platform incentives. Fee sharing depends on how active the trading pair is—the more trades, the more you earn; platform incentives are extra rewards distributed by Gate to attract liquidity. Actual yields depend on factors like pair popularity, your share of the pool, and market conditions. Annualized returns typically range from 10%–100%, but remember to account for impermanent loss.
The ideal time to withdraw liquidity is when your earned fees can no longer offset impermanent loss. On Gate’s liquidity page you can monitor your returns, impermanent loss, and net profit in real time—if you see sustained losses it may be time to exit. Additionally, if you expect a token’s price will soon surge, withdrawing early can help avoid future impermanent loss. To withdraw, simply redeem your LP tokens for the underlying assets; the process usually completes within minutes.
Stablecoin pairs (such as USDT/USDC) are better suited for risk-averse beginners because their prices rarely fluctuate, resulting in negligible impermanent loss; earnings mainly come from trading fees for greater predictability. Volatile pairs (like ETH/BTC) often have higher volumes—and higher fee yields—but also carry significantly greater impermanent loss risks, making them suitable for more experienced investors. It’s recommended that beginners start with stablecoin pairs before exploring higher-risk options.


