eip 3074

Ethereum Improvement Proposal 3074 (EIP-3074) is an Ethereum protocol upgrade that enhances account abstraction capabilities by introducing two new opcodes, AUTH and AUTHCALL, allowing smart contracts to execute transactions on behalf of Externally Owned Accounts (EOAs) with proper user authorization, enabling more flexible transaction models including gasless transactions and transaction batching.
eip 3074

Ethereum Improvement Proposal (EIP) 3074 is a significant Ethereum protocol upgrade designed to enhance account abstraction capabilities, allowing users to authorize external contracts to execute transactions on their behalf. This proposal introduces two new opcodes: AUTH and AUTHCALL, enabling smart contracts to perform operations on behalf of user's Externally Owned Accounts (EOAs) after receiving signed authorization. This significantly improves Ethereum's user experience, reduces transaction complexity, and paves the way for advanced features like gasless transactions and transaction batching.

Background: The Origin of EIP 3074

Ethereum Improvement Proposal 3074 was introduced in late 2020 by Ethereum developers Sam Wilson, Ansgar Dietrichs, and Matt Garnett. The proposal emerged from growing demands within the Ethereum ecosystem for account abstraction and more flexible transaction models. Before EIP-3074, Ethereum's transaction model was relatively rigid, requiring users to initiate transactions directly from their externally owned accounts and pay gas fees, which limited many potential use cases and user experience improvements.
Ethereum has faced pressure to improve user experience and lower barriers to entry. The traditional Ethereum transaction model requires users to understand gas fees, manage private keys, and interact directly with the blockchain, creating obstacles for new users. EIP-3074 is part of a long-term exploration of the account abstraction concept, which has been discussed in the Ethereum community for years, aiming to make user interactions with the blockchain more seamless and intuitive.
In Ethereum's development history, EIP-3074 represents an important technical evolution, offering a progressive improvement method by extending the existing account model rather than completely rewriting it. This approach allows the proposal to remain compatible with Ethereum's existing security models and infrastructure while still delivering significant functional enhancements.

Work Mechanism: How EIP 3074 Functions

EIP-3074 introduces two new opcodes that work together to enable account abstraction:

  1. AUTH: Verifies a user's signature and returns the signer's address. When a contract calls this opcode, it validates whether a provided signature is valid and confirms the signer's identity.
  2. AUTHCALL: Allows a contract that has been authenticated through AUTH to perform operations on behalf of the user's externally owned account. This enables the contract to use the user's permissions to interact, including transferring funds or interacting with other contracts.
    The workflow proceeds as follows:
  3. The user generates a signature with specific permissions and limitations.
  4. The user submits this signature to an invoker contract.
  5. The invoker contract verifies the signature and retrieves the user's address using the AUTH opcode.
  6. Upon successful verification, the invoker contract can execute various operations on behalf of the user through the AUTHCALL opcode.
  7. These operations are recorded on the blockchain as executed by the user's EOA account, although they are actually executed by the contract.
    A key design feature of EIP-3074 is its permission model. Users can precisely control the scope of permissions granted to the invoker contract, including which contracts can be accessed, how much funds can be transferred, and the duration of the authorization. This granular control ensures that even when users authorize contracts to act on their behalf, they maintain a high level of security and account autonomy.
    Additionally, EIP-3074 prevents signature reuse across different contracts by incorporating signer recovery data and contract addresses as part of the signature, thereby avoiding potential security risks.

Risks and Challenges of EIP 3074

Despite the significant functional improvements EIP-3074 brings, it also faces several risks and challenges:

  1. Security Risks
    • Signature reuse risk: Poorly designed signatures could potentially be reused by malicious contracts
    • Over-authorization of permissions: Users might unintentionally grant excessive permissions to invoker contracts
    • Interface spoofing: Malicious applications could mislead users into signing dangerous authorizations
  2. Technical Implementation Challenges
    • Compatibility issues with existing wallets and applications
    • Establishing and implementing signature standards
    • Requirements for modifications to node and client software
  3. User Experience Considerations
    • Complex permission models may be difficult to explain to average users
    • User interface design challenges for signature requests
    • Ensuring users truly understand the permissions they are granting
  4. Network Impact
    • Potential effects on network performance and block size
    • Competition and coordination with other account abstraction proposals
      Moreover, implementing EIP-3074 requires broad community consensus and thorough security audits. As it introduces powerful new functionality that could alter Ethereum's fundamental transaction model, its long-term impact must be carefully evaluated. Security researchers have pointed out that without appropriate safeguards, the AUTH and AUTHCALL opcodes could potentially be exploited maliciously, necessitating adequate security measures in the final implementation.
      Ethereum development teams need to balance innovation with security, ensuring that EIP-3074's implementation delivers the expected functional improvements without introducing new vulnerabilities or risks.
      Ethereum Improvement Proposal 3074 represents a significant step in Ethereum's evolution toward a more flexible, user-friendly blockchain platform. By introducing account abstraction mechanisms, it has the potential to address multiple pain points in the Ethereum user experience, such as gas fee complexity and cumbersome transaction processes. For developers, EIP-3074 opens up new possibilities, allowing for the creation of more sophisticated, user-friendly decentralized applications. In the long run, such improvements are crucial for Ethereum to achieve mass adoption, as they lower the entry barriers for new users and provide the technical foundation for innovative use cases. As the Ethereum ecosystem continues to evolve, proposals like EIP-3074 will play a key role in shaping a more inclusive and functional blockchain future.
A simple like goes a long way

Share

Related Glossaries
epoch
In Web3, "cycle" refers to recurring processes or windows within blockchain protocols or applications that occur at fixed time or block intervals. Examples include Bitcoin halving events, Ethereum consensus rounds, token vesting schedules, Layer 2 withdrawal challenge periods, funding rate and yield settlements, oracle updates, and governance voting periods. The duration, triggering conditions, and flexibility of these cycles vary across different systems. Understanding these cycles can help you manage liquidity, optimize the timing of your actions, and identify risk boundaries.
Define Nonce
A nonce is a one-time-use number that ensures the uniqueness of operations and prevents replay attacks with old messages. In blockchain, an account’s nonce determines the order of transactions. In Bitcoin mining, the nonce is used to find a hash that meets the required difficulty. For login signatures, the nonce acts as a challenge value to enhance security. Nonces are fundamental across transactions, mining, and authentication processes.
Centralized
Centralization refers to an operational model where resources and decision-making power are concentrated within a small group of organizations or platforms. In the crypto industry, centralization is commonly seen in exchange custody, stablecoin issuance, node operation, and cross-chain bridge permissions. While centralization can enhance efficiency and user experience, it also introduces risks such as single points of failure, censorship, and insufficient transparency. Understanding the meaning of centralization is essential for choosing between CEX and DEX, evaluating project architectures, and developing effective risk management strategies.
What Is a Nonce
Nonce can be understood as a “number used once,” designed to ensure that a specific operation is executed only once or in a sequential order. In blockchain and cryptography, nonces are commonly used in three scenarios: transaction nonces guarantee that account transactions are processed sequentially and cannot be repeated; mining nonces are used to search for a hash that meets a certain difficulty level; and signature or login nonces prevent messages from being reused in replay attacks. You will encounter the concept of nonce when making on-chain transactions, monitoring mining processes, or using your wallet to log into websites.
Immutable
Immutability is a fundamental property of blockchain technology that prevents data from being altered or deleted once it has been recorded and received sufficient confirmations. Implemented through cryptographic hash functions linked in chains and consensus mechanisms, immutability ensures transaction history integrity and verifiability, providing a trustless foundation for decentralized systems.

Related Articles

What Is Ethereum 2.0? Understanding The Merge
Intermediate

What Is Ethereum 2.0? Understanding The Merge

A change in one of the top cryptocurrencies that might impact the whole ecosystem
2023-01-18 14:25:24
Reflections on Ethereum Governance Following the 3074 Saga
Intermediate

Reflections on Ethereum Governance Following the 3074 Saga

The Ethereum EIP-3074/EIP-7702 incident reveals the complexity of its governance structure: in addition to the formal governance processes, the informal roadmaps proposed by researchers also have significant influence.
2024-06-12 02:04:52
Blockchain Profitability & Issuance - Does It Matter?
Intermediate

Blockchain Profitability & Issuance - Does It Matter?

In the field of blockchain investment, the profitability of PoW (Proof of Work) and PoS (Proof of Stake) blockchains has always been a topic of significant interest. Crypto influencer Donovan has written an article exploring the profitability models of these blockchains, particularly focusing on the differences between Ethereum and Solana, and analyzing whether blockchain profitability should be a key concern for investors.
2024-06-17 15:14:00