Introduction: Investment Comparison of TRUF vs IMX
In the cryptocurrency market, the comparison between TRUF and IMX has been an unavoidable topic for investors. The two not only show significant differences in market cap ranking, application scenarios, and price performance but also represent different positions in the crypto asset landscape.
TRUF (TRUF): Since its launch, it has gained market recognition for its role as a leading DRP (definite reference point protocol) for economic truth, powering the tokenization of Real World Assets.
IMX (IMX): Introduced as a second layer (L2) scaling solution for NFTs on Ethereum, it offers instant transactions, large-scale scalability, and zero gas fees for minting and trading.
This article will comprehensively analyze the investment value comparison between TRUF and IMX, focusing on historical price trends, supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, technological ecosystems, and future predictions, attempting to answer the question investors care about most:
"Which is the better buy right now?"
I. Price History Comparison and Current Market Status
TRUF (Coin A) and IMX (Coin B) Historical Price Trends
- 2024: TRUF reached its all-time high of $0.91673 on April 15, 2024, possibly due to significant project developments or market optimism.
- 2021: IMX hit its all-time high of $9.52 on November 26, 2021, likely influenced by the overall crypto market bull run and increased interest in NFT-related projects.
- Comparative Analysis: In the recent market cycle, TRUF has fallen from its high of $0.91673 to a current price of $0.008085, a decline of over 99%. IMX has also experienced a significant drop, falling from its peak of $9.52 to $0.3127, a decrease of about 96.7%.
Current Market Situation (2025-11-23)
- TRUF current price: $0.008085
- IMX current price: $0.3127
- 24-hour trading volume: TRUF $63,305.92 vs IMX $97,803.78
- Market Sentiment Index (Fear & Greed Index): 13 (Extreme Fear)
Click to view real-time prices:

II. Core Factors Affecting Investment Value of TRUF vs IMX
Supply Mechanisms Comparison (Tokenomics)
-
TRUF: Fixed supply of 100 million tokens with a deflationary model where tokens are burned through transactions
-
IMX: Total supply of 2 billion tokens with gradual release through staking rewards and ecosystem development
-
📌 Historical pattern: Deflationary models like TRUF's tend to create upward price pressure during periods of high network activity, while IMX's gradual release model provides more predictable inflation but potentially less scarcity value.
Institutional Adoption and Market Applications
- Institutional holdings: IMX has attracted more institutional investment, with backing from major gaming companies and venture capital firms
- Enterprise adoption: IMX shows stronger enterprise integration with major gaming platforms like GameStop, TikTok, and over 200 projects building on the protocol
- Regulatory attitudes: Both tokens face similar regulatory environments, though IMX's focus on gaming NFTs may position it more favorably in jurisdictions that differentiate between gaming assets and financial instruments
Technology Development and Ecosystem Building
- TRUF technology upgrades: Focus on improving the Trust Network's security and scalability with enhanced staking mechanisms
- IMX technology development: Continuous improvement of the zkEVM rollup solution with high transaction throughput (up to 9,000 TPS) and zero gas fees for users
- Ecosystem comparison: IMX has a more developed ecosystem particularly in gaming and NFTs with over 200 projects, while TRUF is still building out its Trust Network ecosystem
Macroeconomic Factors and Market Cycles
- Performance in inflationary environments: IMX may demonstrate more resilience due to its stronger adoption and use cases in gaming, which tends to be less correlated with traditional markets
- Macro monetary policy impacts: Both tokens show sensitivity to broader crypto market trends, which are influenced by interest rates and dollar strength
- Geopolitical factors: IMX's global gaming ecosystem provides more geographical diversification of usage, potentially reducing regional regulatory risk
III. 2025-2030 Price Prediction: TRUF vs IMX
Short-term Prediction (2025)
- TRUF: Conservative $0.00561039 - $0.008131 | Optimistic $0.008131 - $0.01000113
- IMX: Conservative $0.292434 - $0.3111 | Optimistic $0.3111 - $0.326655
Mid-term Prediction (2027)
- TRUF may enter a growth phase, with an estimated price range of $0.00778820313825 - $0.01659225885975
- IMX may enter a steady growth phase, with an estimated price range of $0.2860331175 - $0.425382585
- Key drivers: Institutional capital inflow, ETF, ecosystem development
Long-term Prediction (2030)
- TRUF: Base scenario $0.013667790274424 - $0.019808391702064 | Optimistic scenario $0.019808391702064 - $0.02159114695525
- IMX: Base scenario $0.338132663692132 - $0.46319542971525 | Optimistic scenario $0.46319542971525 - $0.625313830115587
View detailed price predictions for TRUF and IMX
Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial advice. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile and unpredictable. Always conduct your own research before making investment decisions.
TRUF:
| 年份 |
预测最高价 |
预测平均价格 |
预测最低价 |
涨跌幅 |
| 2025 |
0.01000113 |
0.008131 |
0.00561039 |
0 |
| 2026 |
0.01350843685 |
0.009066065 |
0.00553029965 |
11 |
| 2027 |
0.01659225885975 |
0.011287250925 |
0.00778820313825 |
39 |
| 2028 |
0.020212644593943 |
0.013939754892375 |
0.010315418620357 |
72 |
| 2029 |
0.02254058366097 |
0.017076199743159 |
0.0097334338536 |
110 |
| 2030 |
0.02159114695525 |
0.019808391702064 |
0.013667790274424 |
144 |
IMX:
| 年份 |
预测最高价 |
预测平均价格 |
预测最低价 |
涨跌幅 |
| 2025 |
0.326655 |
0.3111 |
0.292434 |
0 |
| 2026 |
0.41454075 |
0.3188775 |
0.251913225 |
1 |
| 2027 |
0.425382585 |
0.366709125 |
0.2860331175 |
17 |
| 2028 |
0.4990177773 |
0.396045855 |
0.237627513 |
26 |
| 2029 |
0.4788590432805 |
0.44753181615 |
0.402778634535 |
43 |
| 2030 |
0.625313830115587 |
0.46319542971525 |
0.338132663692132 |
48 |
IV. Investment Strategy Comparison: TRUF vs IMX
Long-term vs Short-term Investment Strategies
- TRUF: Suitable for investors focused on real-world asset tokenization and economic truth protocols
- IMX: Suitable for investors interested in NFT and gaming ecosystems with scalability solutions
Risk Management and Asset Allocation
- Conservative investors: TRUF: 20% vs IMX: 80%
- Aggressive investors: TRUF: 40% vs IMX: 60%
- Hedging tools: Stablecoin allocation, options, cross-token portfolio
V. Potential Risk Comparison
Market Risks
- TRUF: Limited market adoption and high volatility due to smaller market cap
- IMX: Dependency on NFT and gaming market trends
Technical Risks
- TRUF: Scalability, network stability
- IMX: Centralization of zkRollup infrastructure, potential security vulnerabilities
Regulatory Risks
- Global regulatory policies may have differing impacts on TRUF's real-world asset tokenization and IMX's NFT-focused approach
VI. Conclusion: Which Is the Better Buy?
📌 Investment Value Summary:
- TRUF advantages: Unique position in DRP for economic truth, potential in real-world asset tokenization
- IMX advantages: Strong ecosystem in gaming and NFTs, institutional backing, scalability solution for Ethereum
✅ Investment Advice:
- New investors: Consider IMX for its more established ecosystem and institutional support
- Experienced investors: Diversify between TRUF and IMX, with a larger allocation to IMX
- Institutional investors: Focus on IMX for its market position and growth potential in the NFT and gaming sectors
⚠️ Risk Warning: The cryptocurrency market is highly volatile. This article does not constitute investment advice.
None
VII. FAQ
Q1: What are the main differences between TRUF and IMX?
A: TRUF is a DRP (definite reference point protocol) for economic truth and real-world asset tokenization, while IMX is a Layer 2 scaling solution for NFTs on Ethereum, focusing on gaming and instant, zero-fee transactions.
Q2: Which token has shown better price performance historically?
A: IMX has shown better historical price performance, reaching an all-time high of $9.52 in November 2021, compared to TRUF's all-time high of $0.91673 in April 2024.
Q3: How do the supply mechanisms of TRUF and IMX differ?
A: TRUF has a fixed supply of 100 million tokens with a deflationary model, while IMX has a total supply of 2 billion tokens with gradual release through staking rewards and ecosystem development.
Q4: Which token has attracted more institutional adoption?
A: IMX has attracted more institutional investment and has stronger enterprise integration, with backing from major gaming companies and over 200 projects building on the protocol.
Q5: What are the key factors influencing the long-term price predictions for TRUF and IMX?
A: Key factors include institutional capital inflow, potential ETF developments, ecosystem growth, and overall market adoption of their respective technologies.
Q6: How should investors allocate their portfolio between TRUF and IMX?
A: Conservative investors might consider allocating 20% to TRUF and 80% to IMX, while aggressive investors might opt for 40% TRUF and 60% IMX. However, individual allocations should be based on personal risk tolerance and investment goals.
Q7: What are the main risks associated with investing in TRUF and IMX?
A: For TRUF, risks include limited market adoption and high volatility due to smaller market cap. For IMX, risks include dependency on NFT and gaming market trends, and potential centralization issues with zkRollup infrastructure.