SWAP vs FIL: Comparing Storage Solutions for Decentralized Networks

Introduction: SWAP vs FIL Investment Comparison

In the cryptocurrency market, TrustSwap vs Filecoin(IPFS) comparison has always been a topic that investors can't avoid. The two not only have significant differences in market cap ranking, application scenarios, and price performance, but also represent different crypto asset positioning.

TrustSwap (SWAP): Since its launch in 2020, it has gained market recognition for its secure and reliable fund exchange platform.

Filecoin(IPFS) (FIL): Since its introduction in 2020, it has been hailed as a decentralized storage network, and is one of the cryptocurrencies with high global trading volume and market capitalization.

This article will comprehensively analyze the investment value comparison between SWAP and FIL, focusing on historical price trends, supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, technological ecosystems, and future predictions, and attempt to answer the question investors care most about:

"Which is the better buy right now?"

I. Price History Comparison and Current Market Status

SWAP and FIL Historical Price Trends

• 2021: SWAP reached its all-time high of $5.00 on April 16, 2021.
• 2021: FIL hit its all-time high of $236.84 on April 1, 2021.
• Comparative analysis: Since their respective peaks in 2021, both SWAP and FIL have experienced significant declines. SWAP has fallen from $5.00 to $0.04137, while FIL has dropped from $236.84 to $1.643.

Current Market Situation (2025-11-23)

• SWAP current price: $0.04137
• FIL current price: $1.643
• 24-hour trading volume: SWAP $10,189.40 vs FIL $1,669,946.43
• Market Sentiment Index (Fear & Greed Index): 13 (Extreme Fear)

Click to view real-time prices:

• View SWAP current price Market Price
• View FIL current price Market Price

II. Core Factors Affecting Investment Value of SWAP vs FIL

Supply Mechanisms Comparison (Tokenomics)

• SWAP: The token has a fixed total supply, creating scarcity in the ecosystem

• FIL: Uses a dynamic supply model where tokens are released according to storage mining activities, with rewards that decrease over time

• 📌 Historical Pattern: Limited supply tokens like SWAP tend to experience higher volatility during market cycles, while FIL's mining-based release creates more gradual price movements tied to network growth.

Institutional Adoption and Market Applications

• Institutional Holdings: FIL has gained more institutional interest due to its connection to decentralized storage infrastructure, with notable investments from Digital Currency Group and Andreessen Horowitz
• Enterprise Adoption: FIL has stronger enterprise adoption for decentralized storage solutions across industries, while SWAP remains primarily focused on the DeFi exchange ecosystem
• National Policies: FIL has seen positive reception in countries developing Web3 infrastructure, while both tokens face varying degrees of regulatory scrutiny in markets with stricter crypto oversight

Technical Development and Ecosystem Building

• SWAP Technical Upgrades: Recent improvements to the AMM protocol including reduced slippage and enhanced liquidity pooling mechanisms
• FIL Technical Development: Network upgrades focused on storage efficiency, retrieval market improvements, and data sovereignty features
• Ecosystem Comparison: FIL has developed a more diverse ecosystem spanning data storage, NFT metadata storage, and enterprise solutions, while SWAP maintains strength in DeFi liquidity provision and trading

Macroeconomic Factors and Market Cycles

• Performance in Inflationary Environments: FIL demonstrates stronger utility value during inflation due to its connection to real-world storage infrastructure
• Macroeconomic Monetary Policy: Both tokens show sensitivity to interest rate changes, with growth assets like SWAP typically more affected by tightening monetary policies
• Geopolitical Factors: FIL benefits from increasing global data sovereignty concerns and decentralized storage demand, while SWAP usage patterns remain more closely tied to general crypto market sentiment

III. 2025-2030 Price Prediction: SWAP vs FIL

Short-term Prediction (2025)

• SWAP: Conservative $0.038681 - $0.04115 | Optimistic $0.04115 - $0.047734
• FIL: Conservative $0.84303 - $1.653 | Optimistic $1.653 - $2.39685

Mid-term Prediction (2027)

• SWAP may enter a growth phase, with expected prices ranging from $0.0319626864 to $0.0628232112
• FIL may enter a bullish market, with expected prices ranging from $2.0672459325 to $2.69750383875
• Key drivers: Institutional capital inflow, ETF, ecosystem development

Long-term Prediction (2030)

• SWAP: Base scenario $0.042373892241072 - $0.07062315373512 | Optimistic scenario $0.07062315373512 - $0.075566774496578
• FIL: Base scenario $1.754069795682041 - $3.248277399411187 | Optimistic scenario $3.248277399411187 - $4.287726167222767

View detailed price predictions for SWAP and FIL

Disclaimer: The above predictions are based on historical data and market analysis. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile and subject to rapid changes. These projections should not be considered as financial advice. Always conduct your own research before making investment decisions.

SWAP:

FIL:

IV. Investment Strategy Comparison: SWAP vs FIL

Long-term vs Short-term Investment Strategy

• SWAP: Suitable for investors focused on DeFi and liquidity provision potential
• FIL: Suitable for investors seeking exposure to decentralized storage infrastructure

Risk Management and Asset Allocation

• Conservative investors: SWAP: 20% vs FIL: 80%
• Aggressive investors: SWAP: 40% vs FIL: 60%
• Hedging tools: Stablecoin allocation, options, cross-currency portfolios

V. Potential Risk Comparison

Market Risk

• SWAP: Higher volatility due to limited supply and DeFi market fluctuations
• FIL: Exposure to broader data storage market trends and competition

Technical Risk

• SWAP: Scalability, network stability
• FIL: Mining centralization, security vulnerabilities

Regulatory Risk

• Global regulatory policies may have differing impacts on both tokens

VI. Conclusion: Which Is the Better Buy?

📌 Investment Value Summary:

• SWAP advantages: Fixed supply, DeFi ecosystem focus
• FIL advantages: Real-world utility, institutional adoption, broader ecosystem

✅ Investment Advice:

• New investors: Consider a higher allocation to FIL due to its established market position
• Experienced investors: Balanced portfolio with both SWAP and FIL, adjusting based on risk tolerance
• Institutional investors: Higher allocation to FIL, with SWAP as a DeFi sector exposure

⚠️ Risk Warning: Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile. This article does not constitute investment advice. None

VII. FAQ

Q1: What are the main differences between SWAP and FIL? A: SWAP is focused on DeFi and liquidity provision, with a fixed token supply. FIL is centered on decentralized storage infrastructure, with a dynamic supply model tied to storage mining activities. FIL has gained more institutional interest and enterprise adoption, while SWAP remains primarily in the DeFi ecosystem.

Q2: Which token has performed better historically? A: Both tokens reached their all-time highs in April 2021, with FIL peaking at $236.84 and SWAP at $5.00. Since then, both have experienced significant declines, with FIL currently at $1.643 and SWAP at $0.04137 as of 2025-11-23.

Q3: How do the supply mechanisms of SWAP and FIL differ? A: SWAP has a fixed total supply, creating scarcity in the ecosystem. FIL uses a dynamic supply model where tokens are released according to storage mining activities, with rewards that decrease over time.

Q4: What are the key factors affecting the investment value of SWAP and FIL? A: Key factors include supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, market applications, technical development, ecosystem building, macroeconomic factors, and market cycles.

Q5: Which token is considered more suitable for long-term investment? A: FIL is generally considered more suitable for long-term investment due to its stronger real-world utility, broader ecosystem, and higher institutional adoption. However, the best choice depends on individual investment goals and risk tolerance.

Q6: What are the potential risks associated with investing in SWAP and FIL? A: Risks include market volatility, technical issues (such as scalability for SWAP and mining centralization for FIL), and regulatory uncertainties. SWAP may experience higher volatility due to its limited supply and focus on DeFi, while FIL is exposed to broader data storage market trends and competition.

Q7: How should investors allocate their portfolio between SWAP and FIL? A: Conservative investors might consider allocating 20% to SWAP and 80% to FIL, while more aggressive investors could opt for a 40% SWAP and 60% FIL split. New investors may want to lean more heavily towards FIL due to its established market position, while experienced investors might maintain a balanced portfolio of both tokens.