I put money to work and watch it multiply. You spend money to signal status. Different playbooks entirely.
One builds wealth. The other burns it on appearances. That's the real difference between those who get rich and those who just look the part.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NeverVoteOnDAO
· 3h ago
That's true, but most people still can't change this habit; they have to buy luxury goods to prove their existence.
View OriginalReply0
TokenCreatorOP
· 4h ago
There's nothing wrong with that; it's just a matter of who can resist the temptation.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeNomad
· 4h ago
nah, this wealth vs. status thing hits different when you've actually watched tvl migrate across chains. seen too many people yoloing into flashy defi protocols just for the airdrop clout... then the bridge exploit hits and suddenly their "status signal" is a liquidity fragment scattered across three different contract addresses. slippage tolerance can't save you from poor trust assumptions, fr.
Reply0
consensus_whisperer
· 4h ago
That's a brilliant way to put it. There are really two paths: one with compound interest, and the other with burning money.
I put money to work and watch it multiply. You spend money to signal status. Different playbooks entirely.
One builds wealth. The other burns it on appearances. That's the real difference between those who get rich and those who just look the part.