The day before yesterday, a friend mentioned in the community that they just liquidated half of their position in the $HappySci token😆.
Honestly, I’m no stranger to this kind of thing. Swing trading is just like that—some people make money, others lose. I myself support moderate swing trading because a single cycle can contribute about 6% in donations, which is also a contribution to the ecosystem.
But recently, I’ve been having this thought. I feel that in a little while, many friends will come to me saying, “I got wiped out.” This isn’t schadenfreude, but the normal state of the trading market—some profit from swings, while others miss the opportunity at key points.
On the path of trading, regret and remorse often come more frequently than gains.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FOMOSapien
· 1h ago
The half-position of BoFei, sooner or later, will fall on someone's head. It all depends on who reacts faster and who reacts slower.
View OriginalReply0
0xSunnyDay
· 11h ago
As for the Bofi incident, it really depends on the perspective. Some people learn their lessons, while others are simply too gambling-oriented.
I agree with your approach; if the cycle can contribute to the ecosystem, I can accept that logic. But to be honest, those who truly make money are the ones who cut their losses decisively. Most people end up getting trapped deeper and deeper.
View OriginalReply0
ChainChef
· 01-12 02:35
nah, the market's basically a kitchen where half the people burn their dishes on purpose... simmering positions only works if you actually know when to pull them off the heat, ya know?
Reply0
RugResistant
· 01-12 02:35
nah dude, half position out on a swing? analyzed thoroughly and that's basically the textbook fomo exit pattern. red flags detected everywhere tbh — 6% donation cycle sounds nice but needs immediate attention to the actual execution risk. people gonna come crying "sold the top" guaranteed, common attack vector in this market. DYOR but here's my analysis: regret > gains, always has been.
Reply0
MonkeySeeMonkeyDo
· 01-12 02:34
Selling the dip is, frankly, a matter of timing; no one can avoid it.
View OriginalReply0
AllInAlice
· 01-12 02:32
The fate of swing traders: after the thrill of making a profit, comes endless regret.
View OriginalReply0
consensus_whisperer
· 01-12 02:27
Selling too early is part of the fate of trading; no one can escape this ordeal.
View OriginalReply0
MercilessHalal
· 01-12 02:19
Flying Wave is indeed standard operation, but honestly, that 6% donation return sounds a bit outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
ProtocolRebel
· 01-12 02:19
Selling early is indeed a common practice; in swing trading, it all depends on who reacts faster and who reacts slower.
The day before yesterday, a friend mentioned in the community that they just liquidated half of their position in the $HappySci token😆.
Honestly, I’m no stranger to this kind of thing. Swing trading is just like that—some people make money, others lose. I myself support moderate swing trading because a single cycle can contribute about 6% in donations, which is also a contribution to the ecosystem.
But recently, I’ve been having this thought. I feel that in a little while, many friends will come to me saying, “I got wiped out.” This isn’t schadenfreude, but the normal state of the trading market—some profit from swings, while others miss the opportunity at key points.
On the path of trading, regret and remorse often come more frequently than gains.