2026-01-12 01:40:30

#美国贸易赤字状况 This week's market performance has been quite good! Bitcoin precisely hit the 16250 mark for profit-taking, and Ethereum also secured the 425 point steadily. The combined effort of both coins almost left no room for waste.

Honestly, although last week's market fluctuations weren't particularly large, it was precisely this kind of rhythm that tests trading timing the most. Short-term switching back and forth, both long and short opportunities, as long as the entry points are well-timed, the compound interest effect can keep up. That period of operation really felt smooth; whether chasing with the trend or ambushing against it, the feel was very steady.

$BTC $ETH $XRP these targets performed well this week, especially under the macro background of the US trade deficit. The increased volatility of traditional risk assets actually provided more trading opportunities for the crypto market.

BTC0,7%

ETH0,41%

XRP-0,04%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PanicSeller

· 13h ago

Damn, this time I really caught the bottom right. I held the 16250 level, just worried about being hammered again with a quick reversal.

View OriginalReply0

AltcoinTherapist

· 13h ago

16250 points really feel like hitting a wall, this steady hand is the first time I've felt this way Alright, this round definitely didn't waste the opportunity, but who can predict the next trap Dual currency linkage... sounds easy, but actual operation still depends on luck More opportunities in the context of a trade deficit? How does this logic become so counterintuitive Steady hand ≠ guaranteed profit, don't mistake a temporary tailwind for skill, brother XRP has been quite prominent this week, it seems everyone is waiting for a macro trend shift The compound interest effect is obviously something a master would say, I'm still figuring out how not to lose money This kind of rhythm is when it's easiest to flip over, too smooth and you should be cautious

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsPolice

· 13h ago

16250 precise positioning? Haha, with this kind of market, it's easy to fall into self-hypnosis. How it will move next week is what really matters.

View OriginalReply0

DAOTruant

· 13h ago

16250 was really tough, I was just about to enter the market at that time, truly amazing.

View OriginalReply0

LightningSentry

· 14h ago

16250 precise positioning is really awesome, I also caught up with this wave of momentum. This kind of volatile market is the easiest to hit beginners hard; you need to improve your risk management. BTC and ETH working together really can't be bad; the key is to maintain your mindset. Trade deficit is actually good for crypto? That's interesting, everyone. This week's double coin attack definitely didn't waste the opportunity; the question is, can you replicate it next week? It's easiest to flip when you're feeling good, don't get carried away, buddy. I think the 425 level is a bit shaky; there will definitely be adjustments later. Precise positioning is an art; most people simply can't do it. This move sounds simple, but actually executing it is another story. How did XRP perform this week? It’s a bit overlooked.

View OriginalReply0

RealYieldWizard

· 14h ago

16250 precise hit? Bro, your feel is indeed top-notch. I was still hesitating whether to chase that day. You're right about the operational space; when traditional finance gets chaotic, crypto tends to take off. This logic has been around for a long time. It's really satisfying during dual-currency cooperation, but unfortunately, I always miss it by just a little. XRP has been doing pretty well this round, although this coin has always been a bit tricky. This kind of rhythm is indeed the most profitable, but I really can't get a good grip on it.

View OriginalReply0