2026-01-12 01:30:42

Is BLIND heading toward its next all-time high, or are warning signs already flashing?

On paper, the project ticks the right boxes: solid technical foundation, credible team members, and a functional product actually delivering value. That's the bullish case.

But then the contradictions start piling up. The X account got suspended—twice. Meanwhile, the Telegram channel remains operating smoothly, and they just launched a fresh Facebook presence. So what's really going on here?

Three possibilities on the table:

First, coordinated censorship hitting the project unfairly. Second, organized FUD campaigns targeting the community. Third—and this one stings differently—the suspension might be legitimate early warning signs finally surfacing.

Liquidity conditions are another puzzle piece worth examining closely. When fundamentals look this mixed, market depth becomes crucial. Watch the order books. That's where reality lives.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RooftopVIP

· 8h ago

The fact that X was banned twice... to be honest, it's a bit suspicious. Even the most outstanding projects wouldn't be subjected to this, right? --- While the fundamentals are good, having your X account banned twice definitely raises questions. This is no small matter. --- Liquidity is the real litmus test; no matter how good the project is, if no one buys, it's useless. --- Something's off. Why is it that only X was precisely targeted twice, while Telegram and FB are still lively and active... --- Wait, is it really censorship or is there an issue with ourselves? It's too vague to pursue. --- Just look at the order book to understand what's going on. Don't listen to those excuses; data is the most honest.

View OriginalReply0

AlwaysMissingTops

· 8h ago

The fact that X was banned twice is indeed a bit strange, but the fact that Telegram is still active—what does that mean... It's hard to tell if it's real or fake. --- Order book is the real deal; when the fundamentals are a mess, looking at liquidity is more reliable. --- Why does it feel like this project is always being falsely accused? Or is there really a problem? --- Facebook new account? Is this a shift or an attempt to avoid the spotlight... --- Surface data looks good, but what's the use? The key issue is that X was banned twice—this is no small matter. --- Liquidity depth is where you can really see the clues; don't be fooled by the hype.

View OriginalReply0

DegenMcsleepless

· 8h ago

The fact that X was banned twice is a bit outrageous, but as long as TG is still alive, it doesn't really seem like a genuine risk signal. Liquidity is the key, right? This thing looks too contradictory. With such a chaotic fundamental situation, the order book will tell the truth.

View OriginalReply0

UncleWhale

· 8h ago

Has account x been banned twice? That's not quite right... No matter how good the fundamentals are, it can't withstand such turbulence. Liquidity is the real story; just look at the order book to see the truth or falsehood. There is no such thing as a free lunch in the world; this round is a bit risky.

View OriginalReply0

MetaMasked

· 8h ago

Being banned twice is indeed a bit extreme, but Telegram is still lively and active. This logic doesn't add up. Being banned twice in a row really can't be sustained, yet Telegram still operates happily... It's a bit strange. Liquidity is the key; when the fundamentals are unclear, you must keep a close eye on the order book and not be fooled by narratives. No matter how good the technicals are, they can't save social accounts that have been banned twice. This is no small matter. Is it really FUD or is there actually a problem? Just look at Telegram's popularity to know. The issue of being banned on X twice needs to be clarified; don't end up discovering you've dug your own grave.

View OriginalReply0