The hard drives in the server room are humming loudly. Lao Wang turned off the billing page of a certain cloud service and let out a long sigh— the company's last centralized cloud server has also been shut down.



Last week, this Shanghai-based gaming studio founder made a decision: to migrate the player data, NFT assets, and content updates of their three blockchain games to Walrus, a decentralized storage protocol. As a result, they directly cut 62% of their monthly IT expenses.

"Previously, I thought decentralized storage was just a hype concept. Only when I actually used it did I realize—what we save is real money," Lao Wang shared in developer circles. "It's not just about cost; players truly own their data rights, and active daily users are actually increasing."

This is not an isolated case. While the crypto market is still navigating the bull and bear cycles, more and more pragmatic small and medium-sized enterprises and development teams are quietly switching to decentralized infrastructure. In this wave of migration, the Walrus protocol based on the Sui blockchain is becoming the standard.

**Cost Dilemma: The Heavy Pressure of Web2 Storage**

"Every time I open the cloud bill, I have to prepare myself psychologically," many small and medium developers complain.

The traditional cloud storage market has long been monopolized by leading cloud providers, creating a hidden "cost tax." For data-intensive applications, storage costs usually account for 30% to 40% of total operational expenses. This doesn’t even include subsequent data migration fees and API call costs—these hidden costs.

That’s why more and more teams are starting to consider decentralized storage—the cost pressure is too high, and they need to find an escape.
WAL-0,88%
SUI-2,92%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GamefiGreenievip
· 12h ago
62% directly cut? Isn't this just a reverse operation of harvesting leeks?
View OriginalReply0
LiquiditySurfervip
· 12h ago
62% cut? That's a bit intense... But upon closer reflection, the invisible fee model used by cloud providers indeed closely resembles the fee traps of traditional finance, and it also makes sense that players hold the ownership of data.
View OriginalReply0
BoredWatchervip
· 12h ago
62% cut directly, this guy really made a profit Hmm, wait a minute, are cloud vendors' bills this outrageous... Now it's the turn for centralized storage to be exploited Can data ownership still boost daily active users? That's interesting
View OriginalReply0
BakedCatFanboyvip
· 12h ago
62%?? Old Wang's move is amazing; the cloud providers' money-grabbing business is about to cool down.
View OriginalReply0
ProbablyNothingvip
· 12h ago
62%? Old Wang, are you serious? That seems a bit exaggerated. Saving more than half the cost is indeed tempting, but I don't know if Walrus is stable. The monopoly of cloud providers is really outrageous; I want to smash my computer every month when I see the bill. Is decentralized storage truly useful this time, or is it just another round of hype? It depends on the long term. Data ownership is interesting; do users really care?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)