Trove's move raised some eyebrows in the community. The project extended its ICO by 5 days right after hitting the original deadline, then abruptly reversed the decision. The flip-flop left prediction market traders on Polymarket confused—odds swung wildly from near-zero to 80% and back down to zero.
For participants watching from the sidelines, the chaotic handling killed the momentum. Some who were planning to accumulate at TGE after missing the ICO opted out entirely. Whether this was a calculated business decision or poor communication, it definitely rattled confidence in how the project handles commitments.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FantasyGuardian
· 9h ago
This project is really funny; changing the wording so much that it made my eyes go blurry.
View OriginalReply0
TokenSherpa
· 9h ago
ngl, this is exactly the kind of governance failure i've been documenting across my last 47 dao votes. let me break this down—historically speaking, when projects can't even commit to their own timeline, the market immediately reprices risk. empirical evidence from the last cycle literally shows governance precedent matters more than tokenomics.
Reply0
HallucinationGrower
· 10h ago
This operation is really outrageous. Saying change it and change it, saying cancel and canceling. I just want to know what the team is thinking.
View OriginalReply0
PumpDoctrine
· 10h ago
This Trove is really playing with our hearts, postponing and canceling again, leaving people completely confused.
Trove's move raised some eyebrows in the community. The project extended its ICO by 5 days right after hitting the original deadline, then abruptly reversed the decision. The flip-flop left prediction market traders on Polymarket confused—odds swung wildly from near-zero to 80% and back down to zero.
For participants watching from the sidelines, the chaotic handling killed the momentum. Some who were planning to accumulate at TGE after missing the ICO opted out entirely. Whether this was a calculated business decision or poor communication, it definitely rattled confidence in how the project handles commitments.