The product leader of a major social platform also serves as an advisor for a specific public chain, which involves significant conflicts of interest. As this platform is building its own crypto infrastructure, a single public chain gaining priority through the influence of decision-makers can obviously lead to controversy.
The ideal situation is that all mainstream public chains can compete fairly on an open platform. But reality is often much more complex — when a representative of a certain chain has a say in product design, it becomes difficult for other ecosystem participants to believe that the competition is truly fair. This concentration of power is indeed a significant test for the health of a multi-chain ecosystem.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-0717ab66
· 9h ago
This is a typical revolving door—exploiting benefits on one side while making decisions on the other... Do they really think we can't see through it?
View OriginalReply0
MidnightSnapHunter
· 9h ago
This trick is really terrible, another big show of power rent-seeking. The conflict of interest is so obvious, yet they still pretend to be neutral.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHero
· 9h ago
Conflict of interest... history has shown that as long as power is concentrated, it will inevitably occur. No matter how open the protocol architecture is, it can't withstand human nature.
The product leader of a major social platform also serves as an advisor for a specific public chain, which involves significant conflicts of interest. As this platform is building its own crypto infrastructure, a single public chain gaining priority through the influence of decision-makers can obviously lead to controversy.
The ideal situation is that all mainstream public chains can compete fairly on an open platform. But reality is often much more complex — when a representative of a certain chain has a say in product design, it becomes difficult for other ecosystem participants to believe that the competition is truly fair. This concentration of power is indeed a significant test for the health of a multi-chain ecosystem.