There has always been an awkward phenomenon in the Web3 storage field: either technical teams focus solely on algorithms and parameter optimization, neglecting market demand, ultimately creating a refined laboratory product; or project teams chase hot trends with short-term gains, lacking solid technical foundations and unable to truly establish differentiated competitiveness. This disconnect between technology and business is draining the potential of the entire sector.



The emergence of Walrus has changed this situation. This project, incubated by Mysten Labs, successfully broke through after completing a $140 million private placement financing, with a valuation of $2 billion. The underlying logic is worth a deep analysis. On the surface, RedStuff's 2D erasure coding technology is indeed advanced, but what truly makes Walrus stand out is the complete "technology→scenarios→business→feedback" transformation loop built by the project team.

**Technology is not the goal; solving problems is**

In the Web3 storage sector, many projects have good technical solutions. But the Walrus team deeply understands a core principle: the value of technology lies not in how finely tuned the parameters are, but in whether it can accurately address real-world scenario pain points. They do not blindly pile up complexity but design their technical architecture around specific application needs.

This mindset directly influences subsequent business transformation. Because the technology is designed from the start for particular scenarios, it naturally has scenario adaptability. When technology and scenarios are highly aligned, commercialization becomes a natural progression.

**Scenario implementation is the standard of validation**

Walrus's performance in specific scenarios proves this point. The project team did not stay at the white paper stage but actively sought real application touchpoints. Through actual deployment and data feedback, they continuously verify the effectiveness of their technical solutions, while also discovering and optimizing business models in the process.

This forms a positive feedback loop: scenario feedback drives technological iteration, technological optimization enhances user experience, and better experiences attract more applications. Once this cycle is running, business value naturally emerges.

**Building sustainable monetization capabilities**

Many projects fall into a monetization dilemma after fundraising. Walrus, on the other hand, has been thinking from the beginning about how to build a sustainable revenue model. The key is that the project team understands that monetization should not be a short-term, quick-profit scheme like "harvesting" but a long-term mechanism that grows with the network.

Walrus's approach is to turn technological advantages directly into service advantages, which then translate into economic benefits. Simply put, users are willing to pay because of advanced technology, and the project gains continuous income as the user base grows. This mode is far more resilient than mere token speculation.

**Uncopyable transformation barriers**

Walrus's ability to achieve a $2 billion valuation is also due to the barriers they have established, which are difficult for others to replicate quickly. These are not just technical barriers but more importantly, commercialization capability barriers.

Even if a latecomer obtains similar technology, it is very difficult to quickly replicate the scenario ecosystem, user base, and feedback mechanisms that Walrus has already built. This difficulty in replication is the real reason investors are willing to assign high valuations.

**Industry insights and risk considerations**

Walrus's success points to a path for the entire Web3 storage sector: do not obsess over micro-optimizations of technical parameters, but instead re-examine the value of technical solutions from a commercialization perspective. The question should not be "How complex is this algorithm?" but rather "What real problems can this solve?"

Of course, there are also hidden risks in this process. Commercialization pressures may lead to technical compromises, and short-term profit goals could impact long-term planning. Walrus needs to find a balance between rapid growth and technical depth.

Overall, Walrus has demonstrated through practical actions that in a highly competitive sector like Web3 storage, projects that can connect technology, scenarios, and business are the true winners with promising prospects.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ForumMiningMastervip
· 13h ago
How is the 2 billion valuation calculated? It feels a bit inflated. Can these kinds of projects really succeed, or is it just another round of exploitation? Walrus indeed has a clear idea, but how long they can stick with it is the question. Connecting the Third Ring is easy, but maintaining the ecosystem is not simple. It's Mysten Labs again; they seem capable of incubating everything.
View OriginalReply0
WenMoon42vip
· 13h ago
Honestly, I think Walrus's approach has really awakened many projects. Good technology is the hard truth. The purely academic projects earlier are indeed awkward; even if parameters are tuned to the ceiling, no one uses them. The 2 billion valuation is not just hype; the key is whether the ecosystem closed-loop can run smoothly. Frankly, under commercialization pressure, the risk of technological compromise is worth monitoring. I hope they don't become the next project to die after a large round of funding.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWitchvip
· 13h ago
ngl walrus finally cracked the alchemy code that everyone else fumbled... the tech-to-commerce transmutation ritual actually works when you stop obsessing over parameter minutiae and start solving real problems fr
Reply0
AirdropHuntressvip
· 13h ago
A $2 billion valuation, sounds impressive... but the key still depends on the tokenomics design, which this article didn't explain clearly. Making quick money ≠ making steady money. Mysten Labs's endorsement can indeed be impressive, but don't forget how those "promising projects" in the Solana ecosystem have failed. After research and analysis, this closed-loop logic sounds perfect, but the real test will be after the mainnet launch. The data will tell us how it performs, and that's another story. Don't be greedy; the storage track is very competitive. This year is also a big year for fundraising. Be careful of another capital bubble. The question is, have the scenarios really been tested? There's a big gap between the white paper and actual deployment. There are points worth considering, but the premise is to understand the exit mechanisms for early investors... Historical data shows that these projects often raise impressive funds, but very few are truly profitable. Monitoring actions of these wallet addresses is more useful than just reading articles. In the short term, high valuations are usually due to good storytelling. Very few projects can sustain a full business cycle in the long run.
View OriginalReply0
GasWaster69vip
· 13h ago
A $2 billion valuation is achieved this way... Having solid technology and strong commercialization capabilities is the real key to making a difference. Walrus's closed-loop approach of "technology→scenarios→commercialization→feedback" is truly well understood; other projects are still struggling with algorithm parameters. Many projects achieve quick profits after funding, but Walrus's approach of running and optimizing simultaneously is more reliable. Speaking of building barriers, it sounds good, but how long can it really last... Can technology deepen under commercial pressure? This is the direction I want to see. Don't let it be another storage project that dies in the funding round.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)