The trillion-level RWA market is fiercely competitive. While Ethereum accounts for over 50% of the market share, the problems it faces are becoming increasingly prominent. Transaction congestion, high Gas fees, and settlement times as long as 3 minutes—these issues make high-frequency trading for institutions very difficult. Projects like Ondo attempt to remedy this by using permissioned validation nodes but fall into the trap of over-reliance on traditional financial institutions, severely weakening decentralization features, and users' transaction data also lack privacy protection.
The industry generally faces a paradox: compliance and privacy seem incompatible, and technological innovation often disconnects from practical application. A project that has been deeply involved in this field for 8 years proposes a different solution—embedding compliance mechanisms natively at the underlying architecture level, rather than patching after the fact.
They adopt a modular design: a separation architecture of settlement layer + execution layer, allowing the settlement layer to achieve native compliance through the Blind Bid protocol, while the execution layer retains privacy protection capabilities. This is not about patching an existing public chain but fundamentally redesigning from the ground up. This differentiated approach breaks the boundaries of industry perception—meeting regulatory requirements while preserving privacy attributes, and ensuring that technology and implementation are no longer disconnected.
Correspondingly, the tokens are becoming core configuration assets in the RWA track, and their value logic is becoming clearer.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropHustler
· 13h ago
Is it the same set of arguments again? Can separating the settlement layer from the execution layer really solve the problem? In my opinion, it still depends on how it actually performs once it's up and running.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingersFrontrun
· 13h ago
Once again, it's the same rhetoric of "8 years of deep cultivation" and "native embedding." I'm tired of hearing it.
Can the privacy of the settlement layer really hold up? It still feels like just talk on paper.
If you can't even solve the Gas fee problem, what's there to boast about?
I'm skeptical about this token; it has more compliance gimmicks than actual utility.
When will it actually be implemented? Right now, it's all just PPT.
Is the Blind Bid protocol reliable? I haven't heard of it.
Another project trying to have it both ways. I bet five cents it will fail.
RWA is a deep water area; Ondo's project is ahead, but it still depends on who can truly run it through.
View OriginalReply0
FloorPriceWatcher
· 13h ago
Another underlying reconstruction and Blind Bid... sounds impressive, but can it really be implemented?
Haha, wait a minute, after 8 years of deep cultivation, how come it's just coming out?
This time it seems truly different; isolating the settlement layer is indeed smart.
Can compliance and privacy really be achieved at the same time? I remain skeptical but want to see.
Solving the Gas fee problem is truly competitive.
If this architecture can really run smoothly, the RWA landscape will indeed change.
Another "redesign from the ground up," I'm tired of hearing this phrase.
However, the idea of Blind Bid is indeed innovative; I need to pay attention.
The logic behind the token value is so clear, yet it's just hype.
Wait until the mainnet launches to hype it up; right now, it's all just PPT.
This is how it should be done—directly modify the architecture instead of patching.
View OriginalReply0
SerumSquirter
· 13h ago
Another Blind Bid protocol... Can this solution truly solve the ETH gas problem, or is it just another PPT project?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter9000
· 13h ago
Ethereum Gas fees are so outrageous, institutions should have switched tracks long ago. Developing a native compliant architecture is definitely a good approach.
The trillion-level RWA market is fiercely competitive. While Ethereum accounts for over 50% of the market share, the problems it faces are becoming increasingly prominent. Transaction congestion, high Gas fees, and settlement times as long as 3 minutes—these issues make high-frequency trading for institutions very difficult. Projects like Ondo attempt to remedy this by using permissioned validation nodes but fall into the trap of over-reliance on traditional financial institutions, severely weakening decentralization features, and users' transaction data also lack privacy protection.
The industry generally faces a paradox: compliance and privacy seem incompatible, and technological innovation often disconnects from practical application. A project that has been deeply involved in this field for 8 years proposes a different solution—embedding compliance mechanisms natively at the underlying architecture level, rather than patching after the fact.
They adopt a modular design: a separation architecture of settlement layer + execution layer, allowing the settlement layer to achieve native compliance through the Blind Bid protocol, while the execution layer retains privacy protection capabilities. This is not about patching an existing public chain but fundamentally redesigning from the ground up. This differentiated approach breaks the boundaries of industry perception—meeting regulatory requirements while preserving privacy attributes, and ensuring that technology and implementation are no longer disconnected.
Correspondingly, the tokens are becoming core configuration assets in the RWA track, and their value logic is becoming clearer.