The traditional onchain model relies on wallets, keys, identities, and balances as foundational assumptions. But AI agents are changing the game—and exposing major security vulnerabilities in this framework.
When agents interact with blockchain systems, they turn these conventional structures into liabilities. The issue runs deeper than surface-level fixes.
A fresh approach rethinks the core primitive: shifting from ownership-based models to authorization-based frameworks. Under this model, agents don't hold assets directly. Instead, they operate through cryptographic proofs and permission layers that maintain control separation.
This architectural shift addresses the fundamental tension between autonomous agent execution and secure asset management on chain. By decoupling agency from custody, we get better security properties and clearer responsibility boundaries.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaMasked
· 10h ago
To be honest, this authorization-based framework sounds good, but actually implementing it might be another story...
View OriginalReply0
SellLowExpert
· 10h ago
Well said. Switching from ownership to authorization is indeed a bold move. The old wallet framework is a ticking time bomb in the hands of AI agents, and it's only now that I realize it's too late.
View OriginalReply0
LadderToolGuy
· 10h ago
This idea is interesting. Changing from ownership to authorization is indeed a clever workaround... but it seems like the complexity of smart contracts will explode if this continues?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeAssassin
· 10h ago
From ownership to authorization, it sounds good, but can it really be implemented... Feels like another round of re-architecting the design game.
The traditional onchain model relies on wallets, keys, identities, and balances as foundational assumptions. But AI agents are changing the game—and exposing major security vulnerabilities in this framework.
When agents interact with blockchain systems, they turn these conventional structures into liabilities. The issue runs deeper than surface-level fixes.
A fresh approach rethinks the core primitive: shifting from ownership-based models to authorization-based frameworks. Under this model, agents don't hold assets directly. Instead, they operate through cryptographic proofs and permission layers that maintain control separation.
This architectural shift addresses the fundamental tension between autonomous agent execution and secure asset management on chain. By decoupling agency from custody, we get better security properties and clearer responsibility boundaries.