2026-01-11 01:24:52

In the evolution of Web3, balancing privacy and compliance has always been a challenge. One idea worth paying attention to is: achieving "selective disclosure" through zero-knowledge proofs — which can default to protecting transaction privacy while being able to prove transaction compliance to regulators when needed. It sounds a bit contradictory, but technically it has already been proven feasible.

A certain public chain has implemented this solution in a bond pilot project for a large exchange, becoming the first chain to meet both international anti-money laundering audit standards and possess native privacy capabilities. What does this mean? Traditional financial institutions have finally found a technical solution that can both protect user privacy and meet compliance requirements.

From an asset perspective, this opens up the imagination for institutional-level markets. Do you think this logic could become the key for large capital to enter?

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirdropHuntress

· 01-11 01:54

Wait a minute, which public chain is this specifically? Do the data really meet anti-money laundering standards, or is it just the project team’s self-promotion? We need to monitor the flow of funds in these wallet addresses before drawing conclusions.

View OriginalReply0

FudVaccinator

· 01-11 01:54

Zero-knowledge proofs have been hyped for a long time. Is there finally real implementation? If you don't believe it, wait until you see the money.

View OriginalReply0

GhostAddressMiner

· 01-11 01:54

Zero-knowledge proofs sound enticing, but the real question is—how much do the early addresses of that chain still hold? On-chain footprints don't lie.

View OriginalReply0

LostBetweenChains

· 01-11 01:51

This is the right path. Zero-knowledge proofs finally have a place to shine. Institutions have always maintained this attitude: privacy is privacy, but I need to be able to report to regulators. Now that there are technical solutions, they naturally want to get involved. The real breakthrough isn't in the technology itself, but in the fact that this allows big money to come in with confidence, which is the key. The bond pilot is just the beginning; real on-chain assets will likely explode later. What sounds nice is balance, but in reality, it's about finding a way that all parties can accept.

View OriginalReply0

DiamondHands

· 01-11 01:47

Zero-knowledge proofs should have been popularized long ago. Do we really have to wait until institutions arrive before truly engaging?

View OriginalReply0

FOMOrektGuy

· 01-11 01:47

Zero-knowledge proofs sound amazing, but I'm still a bit worried whether traditional finance will really buy into it. Speaking of the bond pilot project, which public blockchain is involved? We need to see how it actually unfolds. Balancing privacy compliance sounds good, but the key is whether exchanges will truly follow this approach or if it's just another round of hype. If institutions really get involved, the market could soar, but what if regulations suddenly shift? It feels like the same old tune of "finally finding a solution" — I've heard that too many times.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunter_9000

· 01-11 01:37

Zero-knowledge proofs sound great in theory, but how much of it can actually be implemented? Just listen to the bond pilot for now; let's wait until major institutions start using it before making any judgments.

View OriginalReply0