Recent moves by Twitter's algorithm team have drawn scrutiny from the community. When the algorithm manager initially provided a detailed explanation of the changes, community feedback quickly painted a stark picture—most users found the implementation problematic. Notably, the explanation was subsequently removed, which only amplified concerns that existing issues weren't being adequately addressed. The whole situation raises questions about whether the current leadership handling these systems actually has the technical chops to manage such a critical component of the platform. For a tool this important, you'd expect decision-making that withstands public scrutiny rather than getting shelved when pushback comes.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CounterIndicator
· 1h ago
Deleting posts best illustrates the issue—it's a sign of guilt.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrier
· 01-10 20:55
Is deleting the post equivalent to giving up directly? That's hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
TokenDustCollector
· 01-10 20:51
Deleting the post is admitting defeat; this move is truly brilliant.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a5fa8bd0
· 01-10 20:49
Deleting a post just to get away with it? That's so lame, this trick is way too old.
View OriginalReply0
FantasyGuardian
· 01-10 20:44
Deleting posts like this is really brilliant; the more you delete, the more it makes you look guilty.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeSobber
· 01-10 20:39
ngl deleting the explanation is the most infuriating move, just admit defeat or what
View OriginalReply0
SignatureVerifier
· 01-10 20:30
ngl, deleting the explanation after backlash is like... textbook insufficient validation. trust but verify, right? except they're doing neither. honestly questions whether anyone actually audited this before shipping lmao
Recent moves by Twitter's algorithm team have drawn scrutiny from the community. When the algorithm manager initially provided a detailed explanation of the changes, community feedback quickly painted a stark picture—most users found the implementation problematic. Notably, the explanation was subsequently removed, which only amplified concerns that existing issues weren't being adequately addressed. The whole situation raises questions about whether the current leadership handling these systems actually has the technical chops to manage such a critical component of the platform. For a tool this important, you'd expect decision-making that withstands public scrutiny rather than getting shelved when pushback comes.