The centralization dilemma faced after scaling up is always unavoidable. Some platform products cannot keep up with user and data growth, and this issue indeed exists.



I have experience with several prediction platforms. Kalshi's market depth is quite good, with a relatively large user base, and the team's attitude towards user feedback is also quite decent. In comparison, the Poly platform's depth is also acceptable, but the team's style is more rigid, and emails often go unanswered, making it difficult to get responses to user feedback.

Although the BSC ecosystem is full of various spam activities, on the other hand, the team is more approachable, and feedback issues are generally responded to fairly quickly—though the cost of this quick response is that the market depth is truly limited. Many ideas that users want to implement on the platform ultimately give up due to liquidity or functionality restrictions.

This also reflects the dilemma faced by Web3 platforms: whether to prioritize depth or user experience, which is hard to achieve simultaneously.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
No comments
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt