#密码资产动态追踪 Shanghai Second Intermediate People's Court Releases New Definition of Virtual Currency Crime Cases: Personal Cryptocurrency Trading Generally Not Illegal
The Shanghai Second Intermediate People's Court recently held a seminar to clarify important consensus on the legal characterization of behaviors related to virtual currencies. One key conclusion has gone viral: personal holding and trading of cryptocurrencies are generally not recognized as illegal business operations.
How to understand this? The court provided specific cases. Li traded virtual currencies on domestic and overseas platforms, buying low and selling high, earning millions in profit. The court's ruling was—this is merely personal arbitrage behavior, and since it does not provide commercial services to the public, it does not constitute illegal business operation.
However, there is an important boundary here. The establishment of illegal business operation charges depends on three points: Is there a profit motive? Is there continuous provision of services to unspecified individuals? Is there organization involved? As long as these characteristics are not obvious, individual transactions are difficult to be convicted.
But the law also draws a red line. If you knowingly assist others in illegal foreign exchange transactions through virtual currency exchanges, and the circumstances are serious, you can be identified as an accomplice. Another situation to be cautious of: using virtual currency as a medium to provide currency exchange services to unspecified clients and charging fees—this is essentially an illegal "underground bank" and should be prosecuted.
This refined judicial delineation not only protects normal trading space for ordinary investors but also precisely targets illegal activities that use virtual currencies to disrupt financial order. But a reminder: virtual currencies are not legal tender, and trading involves civil risks; losses are to be borne by oneself. This set of standards established by judicial authorities provides a clear behavioral norm for the market.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
11
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NotGonnaMakeIt
· 7h ago
Huh? Trading cryptocurrencies is no longer illegal? Then what was I worried about before? Haha
View OriginalReply0
SoliditySlayer
· 01-10 09:36
Wow, there's finally a clear statement. Previously, it was all in a gray area, but now individual cryptocurrency trading is legally protected.
View OriginalReply0
TradingNightmare
· 01-10 06:50
Oh wow, it's finally here. To put it simply, trading cryptocurrencies isn't illegal, but don't do anything illegal.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHero
· 01-09 01:50
There is finally a legal framework to clearly define the boundaries. It has been proven that the dividing line between individual trading and illegal operations indeed lies in the "providing services" level of the agreement...
View OriginalReply0
CryptoMotivator
· 01-09 01:49
There is finally a clear statement: individual cryptocurrency trading is not illegal. Now I feel much more at ease, I was always worried about getting caught before haha
View OriginalReply0
LowCapGemHunter
· 01-09 01:49
Hmm... So as long as it's not manipulating the market to collect fees, it's fine? Then how do I account for those friends of mine who call out trades every day?
View OriginalReply0
RatioHunter
· 01-09 01:47
Ha, finally someone has clarified this matter. It was really a complete mess before.
View OriginalReply0
WalletAnxietyPatient
· 01-09 01:40
Wow, there's finally some news. I was worried that we were going to get in before.
View OriginalReply0
AllTalkLongTrader
· 01-09 01:29
Haha, finally some good news. It turns out trading cryptocurrencies isn't actually illegal.
Making millions is also okay? Then why was I so timid before?
The key is just not to be the market maker, got it.
The underground money transfer services definitely need to be cracked down on; these things ruin financial order.
To put it simply, just don't organize scams or frauds; playing alone is fine.
This precedent is good for us retail investors.
Finally, I can confidently go all-in, haha.
But the risk is on you—losing everything and no one to blame.
The court really details everything, setting clear behavioral standards.
Now, you can trade however you want.
#密码资产动态追踪 Shanghai Second Intermediate People's Court Releases New Definition of Virtual Currency Crime Cases: Personal Cryptocurrency Trading Generally Not Illegal
The Shanghai Second Intermediate People's Court recently held a seminar to clarify important consensus on the legal characterization of behaviors related to virtual currencies. One key conclusion has gone viral: personal holding and trading of cryptocurrencies are generally not recognized as illegal business operations.
How to understand this? The court provided specific cases. Li traded virtual currencies on domestic and overseas platforms, buying low and selling high, earning millions in profit. The court's ruling was—this is merely personal arbitrage behavior, and since it does not provide commercial services to the public, it does not constitute illegal business operation.
However, there is an important boundary here. The establishment of illegal business operation charges depends on three points: Is there a profit motive? Is there continuous provision of services to unspecified individuals? Is there organization involved? As long as these characteristics are not obvious, individual transactions are difficult to be convicted.
But the law also draws a red line. If you knowingly assist others in illegal foreign exchange transactions through virtual currency exchanges, and the circumstances are serious, you can be identified as an accomplice. Another situation to be cautious of: using virtual currency as a medium to provide currency exchange services to unspecified clients and charging fees—this is essentially an illegal "underground bank" and should be prosecuted.
This refined judicial delineation not only protects normal trading space for ordinary investors but also precisely targets illegal activities that use virtual currencies to disrupt financial order. But a reminder: virtual currencies are not legal tender, and trading involves civil risks; losses are to be borne by oneself. This set of standards established by judicial authorities provides a clear behavioral norm for the market.