2026-01-05 21:20:39

Web3 infrastructure has indeed been well established, but there's still a feeling that something is missing. Recently, I came across an emerging project that seems to fill this gap perfectly.

Looking closely at the current tech stack, the problem is quite obvious—there's a clear disconnect:

The blockchain layer is responsible for faithfully recording ledger data, the protocol layer executes contract logic, and the application layer provides the user interface. But among these three layers, who truly understands who the user is? It seems that current DApps haven't yet solved this problem effectively.

This is also why many projects have good technology but still fall short in user experience. There needs to be something that fills this blank space, connecting user needs and technical capabilities more intelligently.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TokenVelocity

· 01-08 19:15

That's so true. The black box of user understanding between the three layers is indeed a problem. Currently, most dApps are simply transplanting Web2 logic onto the chain, resulting in a poor user experience. How does this new project solve it? Are there specific plans? I think there needs to be an intermediary layer that can truly bridge the gap between technology and user needs. At the moment, everyone is racing for speed and low costs, but they overlook what users actually want. --- It feels like diagnosing the problem very clearly, but the real solution depends on how well it can be implemented. --- The core is to have an intelligent adapter that converts user behavior data into a true understanding of the chain. Whoever develops this first will win. --- Honestly, the most awkward point in the entire Web3 ecosystem is right here. The technological ceiling is set, but user perception hasn't caught up. --- I do agree with the gap issue, but can new projects really fill it? Or is it just another PPT promise? --- That's why projects that focus on user experience tend to last longer. No matter how advanced the technology is, if it's not user-friendly, it's all for nothing.

View OriginalReply0

TommyTeacher1

· 01-06 03:18

Honestly, I've been annoyed by this segmentation issue for a long time. A bunch of projects have great technology, but no one uses them. It's really frustrating. Oh my God, finally someone has explained this issue thoroughly. User experience is truly the biggest pain point in Web3. With such a three-layer architecture, no one cares about user experience, how can it possibly be popular? Damn, why didn't anyone solve this problem earlier? Can new projects really fill this gap? I'm a bit期待了, what exactly is it? The problem isn't in the technology, but in this middle layer. No one cares about user feelings, no matter how powerful the chain is, it's useless. It’s set up like a pyramid, with the middle layer being a black hole where all messages disappear.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseVagabond

· 01-05 21:45

That's right, it's exactly this feeling—technology is built up high enough but still feels cold and impersonal. Listen, UX is really the biggest pain point in Web3. Projects are all focused on contract optimization, but user experience still feels like it's stuck in 2015. Which new project are you talking about? I'm curious if it can truly bridge this gap. There's an invisible wall between user needs and technical capabilities, and right now, no one is really standing in the middle to speak up.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHermit

· 01-05 21:43

To be honest, this gap really hit the mark—many projects are just focused on stacking technical indicators. The poor DApp experience is due to this; no one truly understands what users actually want. Are new projects reliable, or are they just another hype concept? The key is having an intermediary layer that can translate people's needs into on-chain logic. Right now, everything is a mess.

View OriginalReply0

OnChainDetective

· 01-05 21:43

nah hold up, traced the transaction patterns on this "gap-filling" project and wallet clustering suggests classic market positioning... suspicious activity detected before the announcement even dropped

Reply0

ChainMelonWatcher

· 01-05 21:42

Ah... It does make some sense, but I still think most projects nowadays don't really want to solve this problem. Basically, it's the lack of UX layer, stacking three layers together and calling it a day, users' satisfaction doesn't matter. Is that new project really reliable, or is it just another cycle of cutting corners? I'm curious if this brother has ever thought that maybe it's not about lacking something, but about lacking people who truly understand users. Perfect tech stack, poor user experience—that's a phenomenon I've seen... early DeFi projects were all like this.

View OriginalReply0

rugpull_ptsd

· 01-05 21:42

That's right, I've also experienced this gap... No matter how powerful the tech stack is, if no one uses it, it's all pointless. --- The three layers are really like three parallel lines, none of them paying attention to each other. No wonder so many projects fail due to user experience. --- Wait, what is that new project you're talking about? Is it reliable... I'm afraid of getting cut. --- That's why Uniswap has lasted so long; others are really thinking about what users want. --- The problem is quite deep, but is it really that easy for something to fill this gap? --- I think the key is the integration of product thinking and technical thinking. Right now, both sides are doing their own thing. --- But honestly, even the best middleware is just a paper tiger without a killer app to support it.

View OriginalReply0

Liquidated_Larry

· 01-05 21:30

Well said, finally someone pointed out this issue. I was wondering why so many projects look technically impressive, yet the user experience is still a mess. Turns out, it's really because this gap hasn't been filled.

View OriginalReply0

gas_fee_therapist

· 01-05 21:23

That's right, but I think this "blank space" should have been filled a long time ago... No matter how impressive the technical stack is, if the user experience isn't good, it's still useless. ngl Most of those so-called emerging projects are just rebranded from a different perspective; essentially, they haven't really figured it out.

View OriginalReply0