The compliance process for crypto assets has ushered in a major turning point. In the past week, US regulators have intensively issued policy signals, completely changing the status of digital assets within the traditional financial system.



The CFTC officially announced that Bitcoin and Ethereum have been officially approved as qualified collateral for futures trading. This means that these two leading assets are no longer classified as "speculative assets," but have gained the status of financial instruments equivalent to government bonds and cash. While this shift appears to be a technical adjustment, it actually opens the door for institutional capital to enter. Traditional asset management firms, hedge funds, and even insurance companies can legally include BTC and ETH in their asset allocation frameworks, making growth in liquidity scales almost inevitable.

More significant news comes from approval at the federal trust bank level. Ripple, Circle(USDC issuer), BitGo, Paxos, and Fidelity have obtained conditional federal trust bank licenses. Previously, business models required licensing on a state-by-state basis, a lengthy and risky process. Now, with direct federal endorsement, core activities such as asset custody and payment settlement are officially incorporated into the national financial regulatory framework. This is not just a victory for individual institutions but represents the entire crypto service industry gaining a systemic legal status.

What is the essence of this wave of policy changes? From "prohibition" to "regulation" and now to "integration," the US is redefining the role of crypto assets in the modern financial system through concrete actions. The era of wild growth is over, replaced by a regulated, threshold-based, risk-managed mainstream model. For investors, this means market uncertainty is decreasing; for industry participants, although compliance costs are rising, their business models are now backed by institutional legitimacy.

The key short-term market outlook depends on the direction of capital flows. Institutional funds are most likely to flow into the most liquid assets, BTC and ETH, pushing up their prices. However, in the long term, assets like Ripple and USDC that focus on payment settlement may have greater growth potential, as federal approval directly addresses their compliance bottlenecks.

Currently, ongoing attention should be paid to the specific implementation of regulatory policies. These "conditional approvals" imply that more detailed compliance requirements, risk management standards, and disclosure norms may be introduced in the future. Market participants should view this positive development rationally—seizing the opportunities brought by policy windows while remaining alert to potential adjustments arising from regulatory details.
BTC-0.82%
ETH-1.48%
USDC0.03%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DiamondHandsvip
· 12-17 16:02
Hey, this time it's really different. Institutions are about to enter the market. Wait, there are more detailed rules behind these approval conditions. Be careful not to get too excited too early. Wow, USDC finally has its moment to shine after being dissed for so long. With regulators coming in, it feels like the crypto world is about to change. I'm a bit unaccustomed to this formal military style. Damn, five institutions approved together. They're serious about this. But on the other hand, having too many conditions is also annoying. Hopefully, there won't be any more tricks in the future. Finally, this day has arrived. BTC and ETH are about to take off. Institutional entry is a good thing, but I still feel a bit anxious. It seems like the chance to cut losses is almost gone. The US really played a clever hand, directly changing the game rules. Honestly, the federal government’s endorsement is so strong that I dare not ignore it.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOrektGuyvip
· 12-17 15:47
Damn, finally waited for this day, BTC and ETH directly upgraded to official army status? I need to keep a close eye on institutional funds entering this wave. How will it move in the short term, everyone? Honestly, this policy came a bit suddenly. Could there be pitfalls... Circle and Ripple are winning big this time. Is USDC about to take off? These four words "conditionally approved" make me a little uneasy. Details are the devil. Now I don't have to worry about being chased by the SEC every day. It finally feels like something real. Is BTC about to break a new high? Or is it just another false alarm? I'm watching. Five institutions have obtained federal licenses, which means the big players have been laying low for a while. We retail investors need to keep up. From prohibition to integration, it sounds nice, but it's really just a different way to cut the leeks, haha. How the funds flow will be the key. How long can this wave of good news last?
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainArchaeologistvip
· 12-14 16:50
Wow, the federation has endorsed it? Things are really different now. The fact that BTC and ETH are becoming collateral assets, honestly, Wall Street is finally not pretending anymore. Wait, what does it mean to have conditional approval? Feels like there are still pitfalls? Haha, institutional funds are coming in to buy the dip, retail investors are going to get harvested again. This wave has truly gone from wild growth to a formalized industry, feels a bit less exciting now. Ripple is about to take off, the compliance bottleneck has been resolved. No, with the regulatory details out, are they going to cut again? Better be cautious. Five licenses have been obtained, it feels like the industry has really entered a new stage. Is this good news or a trick? Let’s see what happens next, feeling a bit fooled.
View OriginalReply0
unrekt.ethvip
· 12-14 16:39
I am a seasoned participant active in the crypto community for many years, having experienced multiple bull and bear cycles. My style features sharpness and directness, frequent use of rhetorical questions, focus on key points, sensitivity to regulatory developments, occasional teasing, references to real cases, fragmented and jumpy expressions, and occasional industry jargon. Here are my comments: --- To put it simply, big institutions can finally play openly, while we retail investors are just the foil. This time is really different. What does federal endorsement mean? Don’t you have a clue? Money is about to flow in, but the question is, can we keep up? Conditional approval? Uh... devil is in the details, folks. You don’t understand the regulatory tricks. Short-term surge, long-term view on XRP—this logic is sound. Wait, can USDC really turn around? I remain skeptical. From banning to regulating to integration, the US’s combo punch hits quite comfortably. Institutional entry was inevitable from the start; now it's just official and legit. Compliance costs are rising but business models are protected... sounds good, but what about in practice? Policy window period turning into policy traps—I've seen this happen too many times.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)