Here's a pattern we keep seeing: economic policies rolled out without proper economic analysis tend to backfire spectacularly. The unintended consequences pile up fast once these rules hit the real world.



What's wild is how avoidable this often is. A single afternoon of work from an undergrad analyst at any institution could've caught the obvious flaws before rollout. Yet somehow policies get greenlit without that basic due diligence.

It raises a bigger question for those of us watching markets and macro trends: how much of what we're seeing across inflation, asset bubbles, and volatility stems from policy design divorced from actual economic modeling? When decision-makers skip the analysis phase, the market usually teaches them the hard way.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DEXRobinHoodvip
· 12-15 22:30
Honestly, this is why the market is always messed up by policies... A bunch of people working behind closed doors without even looking at basic data, and then retail investors have to pay the price. It's really annoying.
View OriginalReply0
MoonRocketmanvip
· 12-13 11:21
Launching without proper modeling of policies is like launching a rocket without calculating escape velocity... The RSI is already overbought, and the market is still soaring. How can it be stable?
View OriginalReply0
FrogInTheWellvip
· 12-13 08:54
I already said it, these people making decisions don't look at the data at all. The vulnerabilities that could be found in an afternoon are deliberately made to be paid for by the market. Should we retail investors buy the dip or get cut? Truly unbelievable.
View OriginalReply0
ZKProofstervip
· 12-13 08:54
yeah this is just... inadequate threat modeling wrapped in policy language, ngl. literally proving my point that most bureaucrats don't run even basic simulations before shipping. it's like they're operating without proper cryptographic guarantees of outcomes—which, technically speaking, means they're not operating at all.
Reply0
PriceOracleFairyvip
· 12-13 08:52
lmao the "undergrad can spot it in an afternoon" part hits different... that's basically describing 90% of macro policy rn. like they're running models that don't exist outside powerpoint slides. no wonder we keep seeing these gnarly price deviations across asset classes — the whole system's running on phantom assumptions.
Reply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)