💥 Gate Square Event: #PostToWinPORTALS# 💥
Post original content on Gate Square related to PORTALS, the Alpha Trading Competition, the Airdrop Campaign, or Launchpool, and get a chance to share 1,300 PORTALS rewards!
📅 Event Period: Sept 18, 2025, 18:00 – Sept 25, 2025, 24:00 (UTC+8)
📌 Related Campaigns:
Alpha Trading Competition: Join for a chance to win rewards
👉 https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47181
Airdrop Campaign: Claim your PORTALS airdrop
👉 https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47168
Launchpool: Stake GT to earn PORTALS
👉 https://www.gate.com/announcements/articl
Beautiful example of prediction markets revolutionizing DAOs.
Should GnosisDAO fund Gnosis Ltd with $30M per year?
Prediction market priced YES at 115 vs NO at 99, meaning GNO up 13% if passed.
It passed. GNO pumped.
As Scroll shuts down its DAO, Uniswap DAO ignores $UNI holders, and others move towards centralization, the old model needs change.
Futarchy isn’t new.
Vitalik’s been pushing it for years. But with prediction markets growing, it’s time DAOs experiment.
‘Vote on values, bet on outcomes.’ Markets decide instead of whales or a few delegates.
If the ultimate goal is for the DAO token to pump, the futarchy is great.
Voting on "buyback program" or funding grants could be decided more efficiently if the market decides.
Gnosis already tested it. Optimism, Uniswap, Velora are exploring too.
Delegates are the current model but futarchy could bring life back to DAOs and make governance fun again.