Beautiful example of prediction markets revolutionizing DAOs.



Should GnosisDAO fund Gnosis Ltd with $30M per year?

Prediction market priced YES at 115 vs NO at 99, meaning GNO up 13% if passed.

It passed. GNO pumped.

As Scroll shuts down its DAO, Uniswap DAO ignores $UNI holders, and others move towards centralization, the old model needs change.

Futarchy isn’t new.

Vitalik’s been pushing it for years. But with prediction markets growing, it’s time DAOs experiment.

‘Vote on values, bet on outcomes.’ Markets decide instead of whales or a few delegates.

If the ultimate goal is for the DAO token to pump, the futarchy is great.

Voting on "buyback program" or funding grants could be decided more efficiently if the market decides.

Gnosis already tested it. Optimism, Uniswap, Velora are exploring too.

Delegates are the current model but futarchy could bring life back to DAOs and make governance fun again.
GNO-2.26%
UNI-3.9%
post-image
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
No comments
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)