Binance Denies $1B Sanctions Breach Claims Amid Fresh Compliance Scrutiny

TRX1,92%
BNB0,35%
  • A report from Fortune claims Binance fired at least five members of its compliance team after they flagged over $1 billion in sanctioned transactions.
  • CZ, Richard Teng, and Yi He have all condemned the report, denying any sanctions breach at the exchange; CZ says the sources were paid to spread FUD.

Binance fired at least five employees from its compliance and internal investigations teams after they flagged over $1 billion in transactions conducted by sanctioned parties from Iran, Fortune reports. In its exposé, the outlet claimed to have talked to some of the fired employees and reviewed some private documents implicating the exchange’s leadership in the scandal. The sources say the compliance team discovered that the exchange had facilitated transactions worth over $1 billion by Iranian entities between March 2024 and August last year. The transactions were reportedly conducted via Tether’s USDT stablecoin on the Tron network. The team then presented their findings to the top brass through the internal pipeline, but shortly after, they were fired. Some of the employees held senior roles on the exchange’s division that oversees compliance with sanctions evasion and counter-terrorism financing laws. Three had left their positions in law enforcement authorities in Europe and Asia to join the exchange. It’s not Binance’s first brush with the law. Former CEO and co-founder Changpeng ‘CZ’ Zhao was sentenced to four months in prison, and the exchange had to pay $4 billion in penalties after it was found guilty of violating sanctions and breaching anti-money laundering laws. The conviction also forced CZ to step down from his CEO role, which is now shared by Richard Teng and co-founder Yi He. CZ: Sources ‘Paid to FUD’ Against Binance When asked about the allegations, the exchange gave a diplomatic response that neither denied nor confirmed the accusations. A spokesperson said that it cannot comment on personnel cases, and it will dismiss any employee who breaches company policy. “As a matter of policy, we cannot comment on ongoing investigations. Binance is committed to complying with all applicable sanctions laws and regulations in the markets where it operates,” he added. The leadership wasn’t as reserved. CZ said that the article contained self-contradicting information and that the staff members could have been fired for failing to prevent the sanction violations, not for disclosing them to management.  He questioned the authenticity of the anonymous sources, speculating that they could have been ‘paid to FUD.’

I don’t know any details or who, but just reading the article, it’s self contradicting 👇.

One could also make a narrative “maybe they were fired because they didn’t prevent it?” IF it were even true. It would also mean the 3rd party tools (the same used by law enforcement)… pic.twitter.com/3JSdGGMcsV

— CZ 🔶 BNB (@cz_binance) February 13, 2026

Teng’s remarks were even more scathing, stating:

“Irresponsible and misleading press articles based on anonymous sources (whether including possibly disgruntled ex-employees or otherwise) does injustice to the great work of our more than 1300 compliance staff working tirelessly to uphold global standards.”

He claims that the compliance team self-reported the sanctions breaches to the authorities and cooperated with them during investigations. Yi He reiterated this view, claiming that the exchange has been proactively initiating investigations and sharing findings with law enforcement. She attributed the staff firings to the exchange’s effort to upgrade its talent.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Gerelateerde artikelen

CFTC Chair Selig Moves to Limit States' Enforcement Actions Against Prediction Markets

According to The Information, CFTC Chair Michael Selig is taking steps to limit states' enforcement actions against prediction markets to prevent state-level regulations from hindering industry development. Since taking office months ago, Selig has sought to create a more permissive federal

GateNews17m geleden

CoinDesk Poll: Majority of U.S. Voters Don't Trust Trump Administration on Crypto Oversight

According to a CoinDesk poll, the vast majority of U.S. voters do not trust the Trump administration to oversee the cryptocurrency sector. The survey found that most respondents believe government officials should keep their personal financial interests separate from the

GateNews1u geleden

Brazil Central Bank Bans Crypto Settlement in Cross-Border Payments

Brazil's central bank has banned stablecoins and cryptocurrencies from being used for settlement in cross-border payments, according to the announcement. Scope of the Ban The restriction applies specifically to fintechs and payment firms, effectively closing the back-end payment rail for cross-bo

CryptoFrontier2u geleden

A16z Backs CFTC, Opposes State-Level Prediction Market Bans on Friday

According to The Block, Andreessen Horowitz submitted an 18-page comment letter to the CFTC on Friday, backing federal oversight of prediction markets and opposing state-level crackdowns. The VC firm argued that cease-and-desist letters and proposed bans from state regulators create a "serious

GateNews5u geleden

Ripple CTO Schwartz Backs Crypto Clarity, Warns Against Locking Out Innovation

David Schwartz, Ripple's CTO emeritus, has backed regulatory clarity through the proposed CLARITY Act while cautioning that industry progress must not freeze future innovation. Schwartz agrees that legal certainty for established cryptocurrencies would stabilize markets and attract institutional

CryptoFrontier6u geleden
Opmerking
0/400
Geen opmerkingen