
A regenerative economy is an economic system designed to enhance and recycle resources, increasing their value through continuous cycles. Unlike traditional extractive growth models, the regenerative economy focuses on aligning environmental, social, and economic interests by restoring and improving used resources. Its goal is long-term resilience and positive feedback loops.
In the crypto space, Regenerative Finance (ReFi) leverages on-chain capital and incentives to fund public goods and environmental actions.
Regenerative Finance (ReFi) refers to using blockchain tools to provide financing and rewards for public goods and environmental projects. Public goods are services that benefit everyone, are non-excludable, and prone to free-riding, such as open-source software and community infrastructure.
It transforms long-term social and environmental value into measurable, tradable, and incentivized actions.
Many beneficial social projects lack stable funding in the real world. The regenerative economy addresses the funding gap for public goods by implementing rules and incentives. For investors and participants, this means they can support long-term value creation while sharing in the project’s growth.
In crypto, capital flows are transparent and rules programmable. Projects can automatically allocate part of their income to public treasuries or reward actions that achieve emission reductions or public goals, minimizing greenwashing.
It relies on verifiable actions, clear incentives, and ongoing feedback loops.
First, define goals and metrics. Projects must convert environmental or community objectives into verifiable indicators—such as “reducing X tons of CO2” or “serving Y developers.” Carbon credits are tradable proof of emission reductions, representing a specific amount of impact.
Second, set up incentives and funding sources. Projects can automatically allocate a share of trading fees, revenues, or token issuance to public treasuries, distributing rewards based on impact achieved. Retroactive public goods funding (RetroPGF) rewards actions after their public value has been realized.
Third, ensure on-chain transparency and governance. All allocations and burns are recorded on-chain for auditability and community oversight. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAO) vote on funding directions, evaluation criteria, and proposal execution.
Fourth, create a positive cycle. Achieving goals triggers rewards, attracting more participants, improving public goods, strengthening the project’s foundation, and making future objectives more attainable.
Regenerative economy in crypto is reflected in two main areas: funding public goods and converting environmental achievements into tradable assets.
Platforms and mechanisms for public goods funding: Matching fund platforms amplify the impact of small community donations by distributing sponsor funds proportionally. Retroactive funding rewards open-source contributions or community services based on achieved outcomes.
Assetization and settlement of environmental achievements: Tokenizing carbon credits enables their issuance, transfer, and burning on-chain (for offsetting emissions), connecting offline emission reduction efforts with on-chain capital while lowering settlement costs.
Protocol-level “built-in donations”: Some protocols allocate a fixed percentage of trading fees or revenues to a public treasury, distributing it periodically to open-source or community projects for sustained support.
On Gate’s platform, two main practices exist:
Filter projects and products carefully; participate according to the rules while managing risk.
Step 1: Identify project types. Review whitepapers and official websites to check for public treasuries, retroactive funding mechanisms, or carbon credits. Ensure disclosure of funding ratios and on-chain addresses.
Step 2: Use Gate’s filters. Focus on Startup/Subscription sections and Earn products. Look for projects labeled as public goods or environmentally friendly; check historical allocations and community governance records.
Step 3: Participation methods. Subscribe to tokens, stake for yields, or make small donations to public treasuries. Staking involves locking tokens for rewards—understand the reward sources and vesting schedules.
Step 4: Governance participation. Join community discussions; vote according to established rules on funding directions and evaluation standards; monitor on-chain proposal execution and reporting.
Step 5: Risk control and exit strategies. Set investment limits; monitor lock-up periods and liquidity; guard against greenwashing by requiring third-party audits or verifiable data; withdraw gradually if necessary.
Key metrics over the past year show steady growth in funding and participation—with asset price divergence becoming more pronounced.
For public goods funding: Throughout 2025, total matching funds across multiple open rounds exceeded tens of millions of dollars. In Q3 2025 alone, some platforms raised over $10 million per round, with participating addresses up 20%-30% from 2024—reflecting higher demand for open-source development and infrastructure.
For retroactive funding: Cumulative retroactive grants in the first and second halves of 2025 reached tens of millions of dollars. Funded projects expanded from developer tools to data, education, and governance improvements—indicating a broadening scope for public goods.
Protocol-level: As of Q4 2025, third-party dashboards show total value locked (TVL) in ReFi-related protocols ranged from $200M to $400M—a roughly 30% increase over six months—driven by new chain support, improved capital governance, and more transparent impact assessment.
Carbon markets: In H2 2025 through Q4 2025, EU carbon market prices fluctuated between €60-100 per ton; on-chain carbon credits showed greater price variance due to liquidity and project quality differences. Prices are influenced by regulatory policies, emission reduction supply, and institutional involvement.
By early 2026, most projects have strengthened impact reporting and data disclosure—using verifiable credentials and on-chain audits to mitigate greenwashing risk—potentially increasing long-term capital engagement.
Both focus on long-term outcomes but have different emphases: regenerative economy aims at “restoration and added value,” while sustainable development emphasizes “avoiding overconsumption.”
Sustainable development seeks to minimize negative impacts within existing systems—such as energy saving or compliance management. The regenerative economy goes further by integrating environmental restoration and social benefits into its goals and incentives—improving systems through operation.
In Web3 practice: sustainable projects may only promise reduced emissions; regenerative projects embed fund allocation, impact assessment, and rewards into smart contracts—continuously supporting public goods and environmental restoration with verifiable positive cycles.
Regenerative economy emphasizes proactive restoration and growth—not only reducing waste but making systems healthier than before use. Circular economy focuses mainly on resource recycling to minimize consumption. Simply put: circular economy means “no waste,” while regenerative economy means “constant improvement.” In crypto ecosystems, regenerative economy encourages positive feedback via mechanisms like DeFi or DAOs so that both participants and the ecosystem benefit continuously.
Choose to trade tokens or NFTs from regenerative economy projects—prioritizing those with incentive models, community governance, or environmental policies. On platforms like Gate, focus on understanding the project’s long-term value creation rather than short-term speculation. Participate in governance voting to actively support projects fostering positive ecosystem cycles.
Blockchain offers transparent, decentralized coordination—accurately recording resource flows and value distribution. Through smart contracts, incentive rules in regenerative economy projects are automatically enforced so contributions match rewards. This structure is ideal for building self-reinforcing positive-sum systems where every ecosystem participant benefits from growth.
Authentic regenerative projects typically have: clear incentive structures (rewarding long-term holders/contributors), community-driven governance models, transparent fund allocation plans, and data proving increased total value—not just value transfer. On exchanges like Gate, review whitepapers and community feedback to assess whether projects are truly committed to ecosystem growth rather than mere token price appreciation.
Tokenomics for regenerative projects must avoid zero-sum games—often featuring decreasing early allocations, community multisig governance, lock-up periods preventing short-term cashouts, and incentives tied directly to real-world output or environmental impact. This ensures token value grows with the ecosystem—not just speculative bubbles—rewarding long-term participants with more stable returns.


