Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Today's Perspective: The Significance Behind Expanding the Criteria for "Light Assets and High R&D Investment"
Log in to the Sina Finance app and search for 【information disclosure】 to see more assessment grades
■ An Ning
On March 27, 2025, China’s capital markets saw another key institutional move targeting “new quality productive forces.” The Shanghai Stock Exchange and the Shenzhen Stock Exchange respectively issued the 《Shanghai Stock Exchange’s Guidance on the Application of Listing and Issuance Review Rules No. 6—Standards for Identifying Light-Asset and High R&D Investment (Revised in 2026)》 and the 《Shenzhen Stock Exchange’s Listing and Issuance Review Business Guidance No. 8—Standards for Identifying Light-Asset and High R&D Investment (Revised in 2026)》. This expands the applicability range of the “light-asset, high R&D investment” identification standards currently applied to the Growth Enterprise Market and the STAR Market to companies listed on the main boards of both markets.
While this measure may appear to be just a minor tweak to the refinancing rules, in reality it is another precisely targeted injection by the capital markets to better serve the real economy. This year’s Government Work Report clearly states that efforts should be made to strengthen full-chain and full-lifecycle financial services for scientific and technological innovation. For technology-based enterprises in key core technology areas, a “green channel” mechanism for normalized listing and financing and for mergers and acquisitions restructuring will be implemented, using technology finance to support innovation and creation.
The expansion of the applicability range of the “light-asset, high R&D investment” identification standards is a proactive implementation of this year’s Government Work Report. It is also the institutional response to the “financing pain points” faced by technology-based main board enterprises, and a key measure to enhance the inclusiveness and adaptability of the refinancing system. With institutional empowerment, main board companies that have light assets but heavy R&D burdens are expected to obtain more ample funding to tackle key technologies. This not only helps listed companies improve quality, but can also inject a steady stream of innovative momentum into China’s high-quality economic development through efficient capital-market allocation.
First, the most direct impact is to break through financing bottlenecks and shift the financing logic from asset dependence to value-driven financing.
The traditional main board financing system is rooted in heavy-asset industries and tends to focus more on traditional businesses centered on “heavy assets” such as plants, machinery, and land. However, the core assets of technology-based enterprises are precisely “light”—that is, patent technologies, R&D teams, data assets, and other assets that cannot be fully reflected on the books.
Therefore, the “light-asset, high R&D investment” identification standards provide clear guidance for regulatory review. This allows companies that have core technologies but lack traditional collateral to open the door to convenient financing by leveraging high-intensity R&D spending and a clear “light-asset” model. This “precise drip” enables limited capital to flow directly into laboratories and R&D pipelines, greatly improving the efficiency of capital allocation.
Second, it further helps reshape the market valuation system, so that companies’ potential innovation capabilities are no longer overlooked and they can receive reasonable valuations.
Capital markets often judge a company’s value based on traditional financial metrics. But high R&D investment can affect profits in the short term and depress indicators such as ROE (return on equity), causing many technology companies in key growth stages to be undervalued by the market.
In contrast, the “light-asset, high R&D investment” identification standards send clear guidance signals to the market: they encourage investment institutions and investors to look through financial statements and focus on the company’s technology barriers, R&D intensity, and innovation capabilities. This helps the market form a more scientific and forward-looking valuation system, so that companies that quietly cultivate core technologies and are willing to spend heavily on R&D can receive the value recognition they deserve in the capital market.
Third, from the perspective of corporate governance and strategy, it injects institutional resolve for technology-based enterprises to stick to a long-term development path.
R&D by technology companies has the characteristics of high spending, long cycles, and uncertain outcomes. When “high R&D investment” is established as a recognized and encouraged label, it effectively acts as an institutional “stabilizer” for management of listed companies—helping them withstand external short-term performance pressure and adhere to long-term technology planning. It helps guide enterprises to build governance structures, incentive and constraint mechanisms, and information disclosure systems that match their needs, thereby nurturing more companies with genuine “hard-core” technological strength.
Of course, during policy implementation, risks must also be kept in mind: how to accurately distinguish “real R&D” from “pseudo innovation,” how to dynamically assess the efficiency and risks of R&D spending, and how to prevent some companies from engaging in regulatory arbitrage by using the identification standards. These are key areas that regulators need to continuously focus on. Only with both sound institutional design and dual oversight can this stream of “precise drip” water truly nourish the fertile ground for innovation.
Massive information and precise analysis—right on the Sina Finance app
责任编辑:高佳