Vitalik finally admits to a major strategic mistake by Ethereum. Are you still holding your position?

Author: Gu Yu, ChainCatcher

After ETH price hit a new low since last May, Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin published a lengthy article today reflecting on the long-standing Layer 2 strategy that has been at the core of Ethereum. He plans to increase investment in Layer 1, which is expected to cause a sensational impact across the entire crypto industry.

Originally, the roadmap centered around Rollups defined Layer 2 as Ethereum-supported sharding, providing trustless block space. In this article, Vitalik seems to have abandoned his previous advocacy for a “Rollup-centric” scaling model. He points out that while Ethereum’s base layer is scaling, the decentralization speed of Layer 2 is “far slower than expected,” and many Layer 2 solutions cannot or do not want to meet the trust guarantees required for true sharding.

“These two facts, for whatever reason, mean that the original vision of Layer 2 and its role within Ethereum no longer make sense. We need a new path,” Vitalik said. To outsiders, this suggests that Vitalik admits the Layer 2 narrative is nearly outdated, and future focus will shift more toward scaling the Layer 1 itself.

Since its inception, Layer 2 has been one of the most capital-absorbing and market-focused concepts in crypto, with nearly a hundred Layer 2 projects like Polygon, Arbitrum, and Optimism raising over $3 billion in total funding. They have played a key role in scaling Ethereum and reducing user transaction costs, with multiple tokens’ FDV exceeding $10 billion long-term.

However, under strong competition from high-performance blockchains like Solana, Layer 2’s performance advantages have not been fully realized, and its ecosystem influence has waned. Currently, only the Base ecosystem remains active at the forefront of crypto, representing Ethereum Layer 2.

Main published Layer 2 token market cap and funding data source: RootData

Additionally, Layer 2 outages still occur frequently. On January 11 this year, Starknet experienced a downtime after many years of operation, with post-incident reports indicating a conflict between execution and proof layers caused about 18 minutes of on-chain activity rollback. In September last year, Linea was down for over half an hour. In December 2024, Taiko’s mainnet went offline for 30 minutes due to an ABI issue, indicating ongoing technical instability.

In fact, Vitalik previously proposed a phased framework to measure Layer 2 decentralization, progressing from Phase 0 (centralized trust committee can veto transactions), Phase 1 (smart contracts have limited governance rights), to Phase 2 (completely trustless).

Despite nearly a hundred Ethereum Layer 2 projects, only a few have reached Phase 1. Coinbase’s Layer 2 project Base, started in 2023, only reached Phase 1 last year. Vitalik has criticized this multiple times. According to L2beat statistics, among the top 20 Rollup projects, only one—Aztec’s zk.money, a privacy protocol—has reached Phase 2, but development has stalled. The other 12 projects are still at Phase 0, heavily reliant on auxiliary functions and multi-signatures.

Vitalik points out that Layer 2 projects should at least upgrade to Phase 1; otherwise, these networks should be viewed as more competitive, vampire-like “Layer 1 networks with cross-chain bridges.”

Source: L2beat

Beyond potential corporate interests delaying Layer 2 decentralization, Vitalik highlights technical challenges and regulatory concerns. “I’ve even seen at least one company explicitly say they might never want to surpass Phase 1. This is not only due to ZK-EVM security reasons but also because their clients’ regulatory requirements demand ultimate control,” he said.

However, Vitalik does not completely abandon the Layer 2 concept but broadens his view on what Layer 2 should achieve.

“We should stop viewing Layer 2 as Ethereum’s ‘brand sharding’ with associated social status and responsibilities,” he states. “Instead, we can see Layer 2 as a full spectrum, including chains fully trusted and credit-supported by Ethereum with various unique attributes (not just EVM), as well as options with different degrees of connection to Ethereum. Everyone (or bots) can choose whether to focus on these options based on their needs.”

For future development, Vitalik suggests Layer 2 projects should focus on added value rather than just scaling. His recommended directions include: privacy-focused virtual machines, ultra-low latency serialization, non-financial applications (such as social or AI), application-specific execution environments, and pushing beyond the throughput limits of next-generation Layer 1.

He also emphasizes the importance of ZK-EVM proofs, which can be used to extend Layer 1. This is a pre-compiled layer embedded into the base layer that “automatically upgrades with Ethereum.”

Over the past year, Ethereum’s organizational restructuring and two network upgrades have made Layer 1 a core strategic focus. One goal is to iteratively increase the gas limit, enabling Layer 1 to handle more native transactions, asset issuance, governance, and DeFi settlements without over-relying on Layer 2. The Glamsterdam upgrade plan this year includes several improvements aimed at reducing MEV manipulation and abuse, stabilizing gas fees, and laying a solid foundation for future scaling.

In earlier statements, Vitalik indicated 2026 will be a critical year for Ethereum to regain ground in sovereignty and trustlessness. Plans include simplifying node operation with ZK-EVM and BAL tech, launching Helios verification RPC data, implementing ORAM and PIR privacy tech, developing social recovery wallets and time-lock features for security, and improving on-chain UI and IPFS applications.

Vitalik emphasizes that Ethereum will correct the compromises made over the past decade regarding node operation, application decentralization, and data privacy, refocusing on core values. Although this will be a long process, it will strengthen the Ethereum ecosystem.

Appendix: Industry experts have also shared their views on Vitalik’s article. Here are some highlights from ChainCatcher:

Wei Dai (1kx Research Partner):

Glad to see Vitalik discussing the hindsight errors of a Rollup-centric roadmap. But asking “what would I do if I were an L2 layer today?” misses the point.

The key isn’t what Vitalik would do, but what L2 layers and application teams will do. L2 layers and their applications will always prioritize their own interests over Ethereum’s. To get L2s to reach Phase 1 or achieve maximum interoperability with Ethereum, it must be valuable for them to do so.

For a long time, this has been framed as a security issue (L2 needs L1 support for functionality and CR). But in reality, the most important factor is whether Ethereum’s L1 can provide more users and liquidity to L2s and their applications. (I believe there’s no simple solution, but interoperability efforts are on the right track.)

Lanhu (Renowned Crypto Researcher):

Vitalik means that L2 leverages L1, but in terms of value feedback or ecosystem benefits, L2 has not delivered. Now that L1 can scale itself, there’s no need to rely on L2 for scalability. L2s should either align with L1 (native rollups) or become L1.

What does this imply? Bad news for general-purpose L2s, good news for L2 application chains, as they can innovate and feed value back into the ecosystem.

Jason Chen (Renowned Crypto Researcher):

As Ethereum itself scales, the most noticeable change is that gas fees are now comparable to L2s, and with further reductions and the rise of ZK tech, L2s are in a very awkward position. Vitalik’s tweet essentially declares that the initial and ongoing mission of expanding Ethereum via L2 has been completed. If L2s don’t find new narratives, they risk becoming relics of a bygone era.

For projects, the main goal of L2 was to earn transaction fees, but for users, L2s no longer hold much significance—gas and performance are close enough to the mainnet.

L2 was born on Ethereum and will die on Ethereum. The disputes among the aristocrats and vassals have also ended.

Haotian (Renowned Crypto Researcher):

I’ve mentioned over ten times before that general-purpose Layer 2 strategies are no longer viable. Each Layer 2 should pivot to specialized Layer 2, which is essentially a form of Layer 1. It’s surprising that even after Vitalik Buterin’s long-stage 2 strategic alignment, many Layer 2s still became “abandoned children.”

General-purpose Layer 2s carry huge development burdens—initially facing technical issues aligning with Ethereum’s security, then regulatory issues due to centralized sequencers after token issuance, and finally the burden of failed ecosystem development. The fundamental reason is that all Layer 2s depend on Ethereum Layer 1 for survival. When Ethereum realizes it can’t guarantee its own security and begins to lead the performance evolution of Layer 1, Layer 2s lose their space to empower Ethereum, leaving only burdens and troubles.