On February 17, 2026, a pivotal moment occurred in Washington, D.C. The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) officially submitted a strategic document to the Ninth Circuit Court, announcing a claim that will forever change the landscape of prediction markets: “We have exclusive federal regulatory authority over all prediction contracts.” This statement is not just administrative—it’s a power struggle over the last remaining assets in the digital financial industry still operating in a gray area. What does it mean? It means that every bet you place on platforms like Polymarket or Kalshi may be redefined from “semi-illegal local speculation” to “federally legitimate futures commodities.”
From ‘Gambling’ to ‘Commodity’: The Regulatory War Over Prediction Markets
To understand why this momentum in 2026 is so crucial, we need to step back a few paces. Prediction markets are no longer a niche industry. According to recent market data, global trading volume in 2025 exceeded $60 billion—up 400% from the previous year. Such a market size raises a fundamental question: who actually has the authority to regulate it?
On one side, state governments like Nevada and Massachusetts insist this activity is betting, thus should be regulated as gambling with licensing, taxes, and age restrictions. On the other side, the CFTC sees something entirely different. In the newly filed documents, the CFTC claims that every “prediction contract” we trade is actually a swap and commodity derivative—and therefore, a commodity, not gambling, but a financial instrument falling under federal jurisdiction.
This dispute is not just semantic. It’s a battle over billions of dollars in potential licensing fees, taxes, and most importantly: regulatory authority. “The CFTC will not allow state governments to undermine the federal exclusive jurisdiction over this market,” said CFTC Chairman Michael Selig in a statement published in The Wall Street Journal a few days ago. The hidden message: don’t expect Nevada or Massachusetts to be able to limit these platforms’ operations anymore.
Commodity Exchange Act: The CFTC’s Legal Weapon for Federal Domination
On a technical level, the main legal weapon of the CFTC is the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA), enacted in 1936. This nearly-century-old law grants the CFTC full regulatory authority over all commodity contracts in the U.S. market. But the lingering question has been: are prediction contracts truly “commodities” in the sense of the CEA?
This is the very clever argument from the CFTC. They do not say that when you buy a ticket on Polymarket, you are purchasing a lottery ticket. Instead, they argue that when you predict “whether Trump will be re-elected” or “who will win the Super Bowl,” what you are actually doing is buying a swap—an exchange contract whose value depends on future events. Swaps are derivatives. Derivatives are commodities. Therefore, in this context, a commodity is no longer just physical goods like gold or rice, but a much more complex financial instrument. And if it’s a financial commodity, then state governments do not have the authority to say “no.”
This logic has been tested in courts, and so far, the CFTC is winning. After all, why would the CFTC relinquish control over a $60 billion industry to dozens of state authorities with varying regulations?
Kalshi vs Nevada: The Jurisdiction Battle That Changes Everything
To understand the latest dynamics, we must look at the Kalshi case—a prediction platform aggressively seeking legal compliance. Their journey reflects a major shift in the regulatory landscape.
In September 2024, the Washington D.C. District Court ruled in favor of Kalshi: the CFTC’s restrictions on election prediction contracts were declared “beyond authority.” Kalshi celebrated this victory and began expanding into sports events. However, this expansion angered Nevada. Las Vegas casinos and local betting industries saw Kalshi as a competitor stealing their business. Nevada immediately filed a lawsuit to restrict Kalshi’s operations within the state.
Here’s the interesting twist: instead of the CFTC continuing to pressure Kalshi as in previous years, suddenly in 2026, after leadership at the CFTC shifted to pro-crypto Michael Selig, this federal agency became a “protective umbrella” for Kalshi. The CFTC stepped in to help Kalshi fight the state lawsuit. This is a clear sign: the CFTC is building a foundation for federal dominance over the entire prediction industry.
Meanwhile, Polymarket—a decentralized blockchain platform—adopts a very different strategy. Despite being fined $1.4 million by the CFTC in 2022 and exiting the U.S. market, Polymarket continues to operate on the Polygon chain with full blockchain transparency. They don’t care about federal licensing because they have no physical offices, no founders in the U.S., and their technology is decentralized. Yet, in the 2024 election year, Polymarket suddenly became the platform of choice for millions. Their transaction volume surpasses any centralized platform.
This is why the CFTC suddenly moved swiftly in February 2026. They realize that if they don’t quickly seize regulatory control and establish a clear compliance framework, all users will shift to decentralized blockchain platforms like Polymarket. And at that point, the federal government will be unable to collect taxes or enforce regulations.
The Explosion of 2026: When Prediction Markets Become a Mainstream Asset Class
Why is 2026 so special? Several converging factors create the perfect momentum:
Leadership Change in Regulation: Michael Selig, leading the CFTC since 2025, has a background different from his predecessors. Known as a pro-innovation, pro-crypto leader, his regulatory philosophy is not “chase and hinder” but “integrate and protect.” This is a breath of fresh air for the industry.
Entry of Major Corporate Players: Truth Social, Trump’s social platform, is planning to launch its own prediction marketplace. When such a big brand invests heavily in prediction markets, it signals that the industry has reached mainstream status. What was once considered a niche gambling activity is now a high-tier game.
Maturation of Oracle Technology: Modern prediction markets cannot function without oracles—systems that fetch real-world data and verify it on the blockchain. Technologies like Chainlink have fully matured. Today, prediction contract settlement can be done in real-time with AI, creating accuracy impossible five years ago.
Oracles and Blockchain: Infrastructure Winners in the Prediction Commodity Era
How can investors profit from these major regulatory shifts? The answer lies in the infrastructure supporting prediction markets. As regulation becomes clearer and markets grow, two layers of infrastructure will dominate:
Layer 1: Blockchain Infrastructure: Polygon (MATIC) is currently the preferred chain for Polymarket. With a recent price of $0.11 and a market cap of $1.17 billion, MATIC benefits directly from every contract settled on its chain. If prediction markets explode as many analysts expect, transaction volume on Polygon will surge, pushing MATIC’s value higher.
Layer 2: Oracle and Data Providers: Chainlink (LINK) is the most important. As the leading oracle provider, Chainlink ensures the integrity of data used to settle prediction contracts. Currently priced at $8.81 with a market cap of $6.24 billion, LINK’s value is already recognized by the market. But with the expansion of prediction markets, demand for oracles will grow exponentially.
Short-term Risks: Although the CFTC is asserting control, during this transition period, Nevada, Massachusetts, and other states will continue legal battles. This could cause short-term liquidity issues or delays in withdrawals on certain platforms.
Lessons for Crypto Investors: Distinguish Between Speculation and Prediction
The biggest mistake beginners make is treating prediction markets as just traditional gambling. In reality, the core of modern prediction markets is asymmetric information. If you lack direct information sources and only buy based on instinct, you are a pure speculator who can be exploited by professional players conducting deep research. Serious players gain alpha by studying policies, analyzing micro-data, and tracking market trends unknown to most.
Conclusion: The Final Regulatory Puzzle for Crypto
In 2026, this move by the CFTC essentially completes the last regulatory puzzle for the crypto industry. When federal authority over prediction markets is legally established, this market will no longer operate in regulatory gray areas but will become a global asset class capable of competing with traditional stock markets in legitimacy and liquidity.
For the crypto community, this is a huge opportunity—but also a great responsibility. Clear regulation brings long-term growth, but also tighter oversight. The key now is to ensure that the growth of prediction markets does not sacrifice the decentralization essence that has been the strength of crypto from the start.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
The Last Commodity Not Yet Regulated: How the CFTC Is Revolutionizing the Prediction Markets in 2026
On February 17, 2026, a pivotal moment occurred in Washington, D.C. The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) officially submitted a strategic document to the Ninth Circuit Court, announcing a claim that will forever change the landscape of prediction markets: “We have exclusive federal regulatory authority over all prediction contracts.” This statement is not just administrative—it’s a power struggle over the last remaining assets in the digital financial industry still operating in a gray area. What does it mean? It means that every bet you place on platforms like Polymarket or Kalshi may be redefined from “semi-illegal local speculation” to “federally legitimate futures commodities.”
From ‘Gambling’ to ‘Commodity’: The Regulatory War Over Prediction Markets
To understand why this momentum in 2026 is so crucial, we need to step back a few paces. Prediction markets are no longer a niche industry. According to recent market data, global trading volume in 2025 exceeded $60 billion—up 400% from the previous year. Such a market size raises a fundamental question: who actually has the authority to regulate it?
On one side, state governments like Nevada and Massachusetts insist this activity is betting, thus should be regulated as gambling with licensing, taxes, and age restrictions. On the other side, the CFTC sees something entirely different. In the newly filed documents, the CFTC claims that every “prediction contract” we trade is actually a swap and commodity derivative—and therefore, a commodity, not gambling, but a financial instrument falling under federal jurisdiction.
This dispute is not just semantic. It’s a battle over billions of dollars in potential licensing fees, taxes, and most importantly: regulatory authority. “The CFTC will not allow state governments to undermine the federal exclusive jurisdiction over this market,” said CFTC Chairman Michael Selig in a statement published in The Wall Street Journal a few days ago. The hidden message: don’t expect Nevada or Massachusetts to be able to limit these platforms’ operations anymore.
Commodity Exchange Act: The CFTC’s Legal Weapon for Federal Domination
On a technical level, the main legal weapon of the CFTC is the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA), enacted in 1936. This nearly-century-old law grants the CFTC full regulatory authority over all commodity contracts in the U.S. market. But the lingering question has been: are prediction contracts truly “commodities” in the sense of the CEA?
This is the very clever argument from the CFTC. They do not say that when you buy a ticket on Polymarket, you are purchasing a lottery ticket. Instead, they argue that when you predict “whether Trump will be re-elected” or “who will win the Super Bowl,” what you are actually doing is buying a swap—an exchange contract whose value depends on future events. Swaps are derivatives. Derivatives are commodities. Therefore, in this context, a commodity is no longer just physical goods like gold or rice, but a much more complex financial instrument. And if it’s a financial commodity, then state governments do not have the authority to say “no.”
This logic has been tested in courts, and so far, the CFTC is winning. After all, why would the CFTC relinquish control over a $60 billion industry to dozens of state authorities with varying regulations?
Kalshi vs Nevada: The Jurisdiction Battle That Changes Everything
To understand the latest dynamics, we must look at the Kalshi case—a prediction platform aggressively seeking legal compliance. Their journey reflects a major shift in the regulatory landscape.
In September 2024, the Washington D.C. District Court ruled in favor of Kalshi: the CFTC’s restrictions on election prediction contracts were declared “beyond authority.” Kalshi celebrated this victory and began expanding into sports events. However, this expansion angered Nevada. Las Vegas casinos and local betting industries saw Kalshi as a competitor stealing their business. Nevada immediately filed a lawsuit to restrict Kalshi’s operations within the state.
Here’s the interesting twist: instead of the CFTC continuing to pressure Kalshi as in previous years, suddenly in 2026, after leadership at the CFTC shifted to pro-crypto Michael Selig, this federal agency became a “protective umbrella” for Kalshi. The CFTC stepped in to help Kalshi fight the state lawsuit. This is a clear sign: the CFTC is building a foundation for federal dominance over the entire prediction industry.
Meanwhile, Polymarket—a decentralized blockchain platform—adopts a very different strategy. Despite being fined $1.4 million by the CFTC in 2022 and exiting the U.S. market, Polymarket continues to operate on the Polygon chain with full blockchain transparency. They don’t care about federal licensing because they have no physical offices, no founders in the U.S., and their technology is decentralized. Yet, in the 2024 election year, Polymarket suddenly became the platform of choice for millions. Their transaction volume surpasses any centralized platform.
This is why the CFTC suddenly moved swiftly in February 2026. They realize that if they don’t quickly seize regulatory control and establish a clear compliance framework, all users will shift to decentralized blockchain platforms like Polymarket. And at that point, the federal government will be unable to collect taxes or enforce regulations.
The Explosion of 2026: When Prediction Markets Become a Mainstream Asset Class
Why is 2026 so special? Several converging factors create the perfect momentum:
Leadership Change in Regulation: Michael Selig, leading the CFTC since 2025, has a background different from his predecessors. Known as a pro-innovation, pro-crypto leader, his regulatory philosophy is not “chase and hinder” but “integrate and protect.” This is a breath of fresh air for the industry.
Entry of Major Corporate Players: Truth Social, Trump’s social platform, is planning to launch its own prediction marketplace. When such a big brand invests heavily in prediction markets, it signals that the industry has reached mainstream status. What was once considered a niche gambling activity is now a high-tier game.
Maturation of Oracle Technology: Modern prediction markets cannot function without oracles—systems that fetch real-world data and verify it on the blockchain. Technologies like Chainlink have fully matured. Today, prediction contract settlement can be done in real-time with AI, creating accuracy impossible five years ago.
Oracles and Blockchain: Infrastructure Winners in the Prediction Commodity Era
How can investors profit from these major regulatory shifts? The answer lies in the infrastructure supporting prediction markets. As regulation becomes clearer and markets grow, two layers of infrastructure will dominate:
Layer 1: Blockchain Infrastructure: Polygon (MATIC) is currently the preferred chain for Polymarket. With a recent price of $0.11 and a market cap of $1.17 billion, MATIC benefits directly from every contract settled on its chain. If prediction markets explode as many analysts expect, transaction volume on Polygon will surge, pushing MATIC’s value higher.
Layer 2: Oracle and Data Providers: Chainlink (LINK) is the most important. As the leading oracle provider, Chainlink ensures the integrity of data used to settle prediction contracts. Currently priced at $8.81 with a market cap of $6.24 billion, LINK’s value is already recognized by the market. But with the expansion of prediction markets, demand for oracles will grow exponentially.
Short-term Risks: Although the CFTC is asserting control, during this transition period, Nevada, Massachusetts, and other states will continue legal battles. This could cause short-term liquidity issues or delays in withdrawals on certain platforms.
Lessons for Crypto Investors: Distinguish Between Speculation and Prediction
The biggest mistake beginners make is treating prediction markets as just traditional gambling. In reality, the core of modern prediction markets is asymmetric information. If you lack direct information sources and only buy based on instinct, you are a pure speculator who can be exploited by professional players conducting deep research. Serious players gain alpha by studying policies, analyzing micro-data, and tracking market trends unknown to most.
Conclusion: The Final Regulatory Puzzle for Crypto
In 2026, this move by the CFTC essentially completes the last regulatory puzzle for the crypto industry. When federal authority over prediction markets is legally established, this market will no longer operate in regulatory gray areas but will become a global asset class capable of competing with traditional stock markets in legitimacy and liquidity.
For the crypto community, this is a huge opportunity—but also a great responsibility. Clear regulation brings long-term growth, but also tighter oversight. The key now is to ensure that the growth of prediction markets does not sacrifice the decentralization essence that has been the strength of crypto from the start.