2026-02-13 06:49:53

#WhiteHouseTalksStablecoinYields 🇺🇸

Stablecoin yield debates are heating up at the White House, and the outcome could shape U.S. crypto regulation for 2026.
Key Issue:
Should stablecoins be allowed to offer yields or rewards to holders?
🏦 Banks want limits, warning high yields could divert deposits and threaten financial stability.
🪙 Crypto firms argue that yields are essential for innovation, competitiveness, and keeping activity domestic.
Current Status:
Multiple White House meetings have been held with banks, exchanges (like Coinbase), and industry groups.
No final agreement yet — the stalemate is one of the biggest hurdles for the CLARITY Act, the proposed U.S. crypto regulatory framework.
Negotiators aim for compromise by end of February.
Why It Matters:
Legislative impact: Yield rules are a key sticking point for bipartisan passage.
Market outlook: Clarity could boost confidence; deadlock prolongs uncertainty.
Global influence: U.S. decisions on stablecoin yields may set benchmarks worldwide and affect institutional capital flows.
Bottom Line:
The White House is mediating a critical balance between financial stability and crypto innovation. The resolution of this debate will determine the path of stablecoin regulation and broader crypto policy in the U.S.

DragonFlyOfficial

2026-02-10 16:00:09

#WhiteHouseTalksStablecoinYields

🇺🇸 White House Stablecoin Talks: Yield Debate Continues
Key Issue: The White House is mediating high‑level negotiations between major U.S. banks and cryptocurrency firms over whether stablecoins should be allowed to pay yields or rewards to holders. This debate has become the central sticking point in stalled crypto market‑structure legislation, especially the CLARITY Act.
🧠 What’s Happening Now

Officials held multiple meetings at the White House with representatives from banks, crypto exchanges (like Coinbase), and industry groups to resolve the yield conflict.

A second stablecoin yield meeting was held today to continue talks on regulatory frameworks and find compromise language.

So far, no final agreement has been reached, and the stalemate remains one of the biggest obstacles to passing comprehensive crypto legislation this year.

🤝 Industry Positions
🏦 Banks:

Traditional banking groups are pushing to limit or ban yield‑bearing stablecoin products. They argue that allowing attractive yields could siphon deposits away from insured bank accounts, threatening lending capacity and financial stability.

🪙 Crypto Firms:

Exchanges and stablecoin issuers argue that yield and rewards are essential for market competitiveness and consumer demand. Cutting these incentives, they claim, would stifle innovation and divert activity offshore.

⚖️ White House & Negotiators:

The White House is pushing both sides to produce compromise language by the end of February to keep the CLARITY Act moving. Failure to settle the yield issue could further delay the bill’s progress.

📊 Why This Matters

Legislative Impact: Stablecoin yield language is seen as one of the final hurdles blocking bipartisan passage of the CLARITY Act — a major crypto regulatory framework.

Market Outlook: Crypto assets and stablecoin markets have been range‑bound as investors await clarity. A compromise could trigger renewed investor confidence; conversely, deadlock may prolong uncertainty.

Broader Implications: How the U.S. defines and regulates stablecoin yields could shape global crypto policy benchmarks and influence whether institutional capital flows into or out of the U.S. market.

📌 Bottom Line
The White House is at the center of a crucial policy debate — balancing financial stability concerns raised by banks with innovation and market demands from the crypto sector. The outcome of this yield dispute could determine the trajectory of U.S. stablecoin regulation and the broader crypto legal framework in 2026

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

4 Likes