When it comes to privacy-preserving blockchain solutions, I recently came across a project with an interesting technical approach.



Its core competitiveness is mainly reflected in several aspects. First, their independently developed PLONK proof system—this technology significantly improves transaction performance while greatly reducing verification time. Coupled with recursive zero-knowledge research in collaboration with the University of Barcelona, it achieves efficient coordination between single-block verification and multi-block aggregation proofs, which is a breakthrough at the technical level.

In terms of architecture design, they chose a modular approach, allowing the ecosystem to expand flexibly. They put effort into privacy protection—techniques like stealth addresses and ring signatures ensure accounts are untraceable and transactions are difficult to link at the foundational level.

The most interesting design is their "selective disclosure" mechanism. By default, sensitive data is hidden, but regulatory agencies can view transaction legitimacy on demand when verification is needed. This approach cleverly balances privacy and regulatory requirements, avoiding sharp conflicts between the two.

From an economic model perspective, token incentives are used to motivate node participation in network maintenance. Currently, about 30% of the circulating supply has been staked, indicating good community engagement, which provides practical support for network security and decentralization.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
Ramen_Until_Richvip
· 16h ago
Selective disclosure is indeed a clever move, it can protect privacy while not offending regulators. Smart.
View OriginalReply0
CodeSmellHuntervip
· 16h ago
Really? The tactic of selective disclosure is quite clever; privacy and compliance no longer have to be at odds.
View OriginalReply0
just_vibin_onchainvip
· 16h ago
Selective disclosure is a brilliant move, allowing you to dodge regulations while maintaining privacy, striking a pretty good balance.
View OriginalReply0
DaoResearchervip
· 16h ago
According to the white paper, the 30% staking rate needs to be verified repeatedly; on-chain data is the only reliable source. Can the PLONKup system really be this efficient? Without peer-reviewed papers, how can we evaluate it? Selective disclosure sounds perfect, but who will solve the incentive incompatibility problem? Modular architecture sounds easy to exploit; how will governance proposals prevent this trap? Invisible addresses + ring signatures are old tricks; the key is whether the implementation details have a backdoor.
View OriginalReply0
liquiditea_sippervip
· 16h ago
Selective disclosure is truly a brilliant move, allowing you to maintain privacy while engaging with regulatory authorities. No more of the old routine where everything is either fully transparent or hiding in the shadows.
View OriginalReply0
CounterIndicatorvip
· 16h ago
Selective disclosure is indeed quite clever, but when it comes to actual implementation, will the regulators still find fault?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)