Jumping from traditional finance into the crypto world, I was initially attracted by decentralization and transparency. But after years of exposure, I’ve discovered an interesting paradox: complete transparency in finance is actually a double-edged sword.



When dealing with real assets—stocks, bonds, private equity, RWA—what institutional investors and high-net-worth clients really want is not full visibility across the network. They need a balance of privacy and compliance: regulators and auditors should see what they need to see; but on the other hand, competitors and ordinary retail investors should have their holdings and transaction details completely hidden. That’s true financial-grade privacy.

The Dusk project is designed to meet this demand. It’s a Layer 1 blockchain, but not in the usual way—it natively integrates confidential smart contract functionality. Its core technology combines zero-knowledge proofs with an innovative Byzantine isolation consensus mechanism. Simply put, it allows sensitive data like transaction amounts, asset ownership, and contract logic to be selectively disclosed. You can prove that something happened without revealing the specific details. Network security, transaction throughput, decentralization—none of these are sacrificed, while privacy is maintained at a professional level.

This is not just a technical showcase, but a key to enabling traditional financial institutions to enter the on-chain world. By early 2025, my confidence in this direction has grown even stronger.
DUSK2.29%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
HodlAndChillvip
· 58m ago
The trade-off between transparency and privacy is spot on. The traditional financial system indeed makes sense.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiNotNakamotovip
· 1h ago
The paradox of transparency is brilliantly explained. I've long believed that fully on-chain is not practical for large investors. Selective disclosure is the logic that institutions truly need. Dusk's approach is indeed interesting. The balance point between privacy and compliance is the key to breaking the deadlock.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingerMinervip
· 22h ago
Transparency is easy to talk about, but when it comes to large capital entering the market, privacy protection is still essential.
View OriginalReply0
MerkleDreamervip
· 22h ago
The concept of transparency has long been ineffective with institutions. Frankly, only privacy + compliance can truly attract large capital to enter.
View OriginalReply0
MetaNomadvip
· 22h ago
Hey, transparency really gets exposed in the face of real money. To put it simply, it's a false proposition.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeTherapistvip
· 22h ago
The transparency approach is very appealing to retail investors, but if institutions really come in, the tone would have to change... Dusk has indeed hit the right note with this idea.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt