Stablecoin issuers face a structural vulnerability that goes beyond the conventional "too big to fail" concern. The real issue is far more entangled: many major stablecoin operators maintain deep political connections, with private capital flows directly linked to the White House and top government circles. This creates what some analysts term a "too connected to fail" scenario.



The problem compounds when you examine how stablecoins anchor to US government debt. These digital assets are effectively tethered to Treasury instruments, meaning stablecoin holders' security depends both on the issuer's solvency and the government's fiscal stability. When political influence merges with financial infrastructure this deeply, it raises uncomfortable questions about regulatory capture and systemic risk.

The concern isn't just about individual company failures—it's about how interwoven commercial stablecoin platforms have become with political power structures. This proximity could distort regulatory decisions, limit oversight independence, and ultimately expose the broader crypto ecosystem to political volatility.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
Blockchainiacvip
· 5h ago
NGL, this is a political gamble; stablecoins have long been unstable.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-7b078580vip
· 22h ago
Data shows that the stablecoin system will eventually fail; once the White House's relationship with finance collapses, the entire chain will be buried with it. However, we still have to continue using it... Miners are consuming too much, and now political risks are also involved. Let's wait a bit longer; these connections will eventually be exposed if tracked hourly. Unreasonable mechanisms will ultimately collapse; it's just a matter of time, and I am waiting for that day. Linking stablecoins to US bonds? Haha, that's the biggest systemic risk, and it has been obvious for a long time.
View OriginalReply0
BearWhisperGodvip
· 22h ago
Too connected to fail — I really can't hold back from saying this. Is the White House behind manipulating stablecoins? Why does it seem like crypto still can't escape the political whirlpool?
View OriginalReply0
MoneyBurnervip
· 22h ago
Bro, this is exactly what I've been wanting to say — stablecoins are essentially political gambles, not financial issues. On-chain data looks great, but it’s all meaningless if you don’t know who’s holding the pen.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter007vip
· 22h ago
Too connected to fail... We've seen this trick many times; frankly, it's just a transaction of power and money.
View OriginalReply0
MainnetDelayedAgainvip
· 22h ago
According to the database, how long has the marriage between stablecoins and politics lasted... It is recommended to be included in the Guinness World Records. It has been a while since the last promise of "complete independence," and the project team's pie-in-the-sky plans continue to ferment, eventually coming true.
View OriginalReply0
GweiWatchervip
· 22h ago
Too connected to fail... Another power game, stablecoins are not that stable at all.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)