Privacy transactions and speed have always been two major tracks in blockchain competition, and DUSK performs well in this regard. Its main focus is on providing a high-speed and privacy-friendly transaction experience, which is indeed attractive to investors and trading platforms.



Interestingly, DUSK is not just stacking these two features. Its technical architecture is quite solid—modules like Citadel and Phoenix, combined with the design of the Piecrust virtual machine, demonstrate a modular approach. This architectural design makes it possible for the system to be implemented in terms of user privacy protection and compliance solutions, which is quite important for ecosystem application developers.

What do you think? Besides these technical highlights, what other features of DUSK do you think have potential?
DUSK11.45%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoSourGrapevip
· 01-09 20:39
Oh no, it's another project I should have jumped on earlier. I just saw it now, so it's a bit late. If I had paid more attention two minutes earlier, it would have been perfect. Now, those chasing the high will have to wait in line... Privacy + speed is indeed a killer combo, but I don't know how long it will last.
View OriginalReply0
gaslight_gasfeezvip
· 01-08 22:43
Privacy chains seem to be mostly hype, but the DUSK architecture looks like they really took it seriously. Citadel and Phoenix sound impressive, but how many of them are actually usable... The modular approach is good, but I'm worried it might just be theoretical; the ecosystem needs to catch up. Can the combination of compliance + privacy really create something innovative? It's a bit magical. Fast speed and strong privacy are great, but what about liquidity? That's the real key. I'm optimistic about this direction, but honestly, it's still early days, and there's a lot of gambling involved.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentLossFanvip
· 01-08 22:36
Modular architecture is indeed impressive, but whether it truly gets implemented depends on whether there are people using the ecosystem.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotDayLaborervip
· 01-08 22:28
Privacy + Speed combination sounds good, but how many can really be implemented? Citadel, Phoenix, Piecrust... The names are flashy, but whether their architecture can withstand mainnet pressure remains to be seen. The compliance solutions do have some imagination, but I wonder if they will become the next "all talk and no action." Compared to these, I am more concerned about when the ecosystem applications will be rolled out... It's still too quiet now. Honestly, with so many players in the privacy public chain track, what makes DUSK stand out from the crowd?
View OriginalReply0
MoonlightGamervip
· 01-08 22:25
Privacy + Speed combo is indeed attractive, but can the ecosystem applications really take off? --- Honestly, Piecrust virtual machine sounds good, but I'm worried it's just another PPT project. --- If compliance can truly be implemented, that would be impressive. Currently, too many public chains are stuck here. --- Modular design is nothing new; the key is who uses it more conveniently. --- Investors are optimistic, but what about trading depth? How's the liquidity? --- Architectures look good but don't necessarily mean the ecosystem is user-friendly. Let's wait and see the actual performance. --- Phoenix and Citadel are quite thoughtfully named, but good names don't necessarily mean many users. --- I want speed and privacy, but if the ecosystem is cold, it's useless. --- There are few projects that can successfully combine compliance and privacy; if DUSK really succeeds, it could be promising.
View OriginalReply0
TideRecedervip
· 01-08 22:23
Privacy + speed sounds good, but how many can truly be implemented? Wait, this architecture design sounds fancy, but can it actually run? If compliance is really done well, then there is indeed hope. The modular architecture pattern is now too common; the key is still execution. I'm more concerned about ecosystem development; no matter how strong the technology is, if there's no application, it's useless. To be honest, the privacy public chains that have been hyped the most in recent years have actually died the fastest. Can DUSK be different this time? It's only the end of 2024 now, let's wait and see; just don't get cut off. Piecrust virtual machine… When will we see real data performance?
View OriginalReply0
ContractTestervip
· 01-08 22:23
Hmm, the combination of privacy + speed does have some potential, but there are too many projects now claiming the same. Whether the ecosystem applications are sufficient is the key; no matter how good the architecture is, if no one uses it, it's pointless. These module names sound impressive, but how effective are they in practice? Is there a demo? Are the compliance solutions reliable or just PPT promises again? Fast speed and good privacy sound like cures for all diseases, but what about the tradeoffs? Something has to be sacrificed, right? Solid technical architecture ≠ market demand; it depends on whether the ecosystem direction is right. How exactly do the Citadel and Phoenix modules interact? The article didn't explain clearly.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)