Bubblemaps Dismisses Insider Trading Claims Behind Viral Polymarket Bet

Source: DefiPlanet Original Title: Bubblemaps Dismisses Insider Trading Claims Behind Viral Polymarket Bet Original Link:

Quick Breakdown

• Bubblemaps says claims linking a Polymarket trader to WLFI rely on weak and misleading on-chain assumptions
• Similar deposit patterns appear across dozens of unrelated wallets
• No official investigation or confirmation from Polymarket or WLFI has been announced

Speculation surrounding a lucrative Polymarket wager tied to Venezuela’s political future has spiralled into allegations of crypto and political insider trading. But blockchain analytics firm Bubblemaps says the on-chain evidence behind those claims simply doesn’t add up.

This needs to stop

Polymarket insider analysis is out of hand

Some posts are linking the Maduro’s Polymarket insider to a WLFI cofounder

It sounds explosive, but the logic is weak

Bubblemaps pushed back against viral assertions linking a Polymarket trader to World Liberty Financial (WLFI). The firm warned that weak wallet-matching logic and aggressive assumptions are being used to fuel a narrative unsupported by credible blockchain analysis.

How the insider narrative took hold

The controversy centers on a Polymarket prediction market asking whether Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro would be removed from power before a specific deadline. Hours before reports emerged claiming Maduro had been captured, a cluster of newly created accounts placed heavy “Yes” bets.

Those positions reportedly turned roughly $60,000 into more than $630,000, drawing intense scrutiny. One wallet alone transformed about $32,000 into nearly $400,000. On-chain data showed the wallet was funded through exchange deposits across Solana and Ethereum, prompting speculation that the trader had access to non-public information.

An independent analyst later alleged a possible link to WLFI, citing a roughly 250 SOL exchange deposit that appeared similar in timing and size to transfers associated with wallets and ENS/SNS domains referencing the name “Steven Charles.”

Bubblemaps: the on-chain logic falls apart

Bubblemaps rejected those conclusions, arguing that timing-based wallet comparisons are being overstretched to fit a sensational narrative. According to the firm, a one-day gap between exchange deposits and withdrawals is not statistically meaningful, especially when analysts focus on a single asset.

When Bubblemaps expanded the analysis to include USDC and ETH, it identified around 20 wallets that matched the same timing and value criteria used in the viral claims. The firm stated that shared exchange routes or similar naming conventions do not prove wallet ownership or coordination.

While the timing of the Polymarket trades remains unusual, the firm cautioned that poor analytical discipline can be used to manufacture almost any conclusion, particularly when politics, money, and high-profile crypto projects intersect. Additionally, BTC surpassed $92K, and ETH cleared $3,100 following U.S.–Venezuela developments.