2026-01-02 12:23:24

Observation on FLOW coin trading volume. This coin has a particularly large spot trading volume on a major exchange, accounting for almost 80% of the total volume. In comparison, other platforms' trading volumes are quite modest, around 10% or slightly more. Such a huge disparity naturally leads to issues.

Ultimately, places with lower trading volume tend to have larger fluctuations, which is an unavoidable rule. Conversely, on a major exchange, FLOW's price action appears to be extremely stable, with almost no noticeable volatility. Only during a sharp drop can you feel the force of a sell-off. It’s actually something that should have been understood earlier: poor liquidity means bearing higher friction costs and price impacts, which is a market reality.

FLOW-11.65%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LootboxPhobia

· 3h ago

The 80% of the volume at the top feels like you're just playing yourself. Small exchanges' FLOW fluctuations are so big, no wonder no one dares to touch it. This is the curse of liquidity, unavoidable.

View OriginalReply0

ChainSherlockGirl

· 3h ago

Hey, 80% of the volume is concentrated on one exchange? That's a classic case of "false prosperity." The liquidity on other platforms is so poor it's almost crying. In small exchanges, FLOW drops sharply with any movement, while on large exchanges it remains as flat as a mirror. Basically, it's just a lack of depth. Want to try smashing the order book? From my analysis, cryptocurrencies with such high concentration will eventually have issues. When big players all run away at the same time, that's the real "surprise." Liquidity, huh? Looks stable but is actually the most dangerous signal. Who knows how many landmines are lurking underneath. I've seen through this logic a long time ago, but no one wants to admit it. Keep getting cut on small exchanges, everyone. Honestly, FLOW's trading pattern is a typical "paddy field street," where retail investors are just part of the setup. If you ask me, this kind of coin structure is full of risk warnings. We should just keep watching and eating popcorn. To be continued.

View OriginalReply0

ParanoiaKing

· 3h ago

80% of the volume is concentrated on a single exchange, isn't that like a fish on a chopping board? Other platforms are so volatile that there's no way to buy the dip. Liquidity is so dispersed that a problem is bound to happen sooner or later.

View OriginalReply0

MEVSupportGroup

· 3h ago

80% of liquidity is concentrated on one exchange, which means it's being manipulated by someone controlling the market. --- The leading exchanges look stable, while other places are experiencing crazy fluctuations. Honestly, it's just the retail investors being locked in. --- Liquidity is so dispersed; no wonder the FLOW on small exchanges is like a roller coaster. --- This is outrageous. The fate of a coin being held hostage by a single exchange—inevitably, something will go wrong. --- So, FLOW is just a carefully designed tool to harvest retail investors, with no real market liquidity. --- Wait, this really is a problem. Users on other platforms are being gouged with friction costs. --- Wake up, everyone. That's why small platforms' FLOW is so volatile—just a cough can cause an earthquake. --- The dream of decentralization is shattered. With such high liquidity concentration, how can you still call it Web3? --- Friction costs, haha. Sounds fancy, but it's really just the cost of harvesting retail investors.

View OriginalReply0

GasOptimizer

· 3h ago

80% concentrated on one exchange? Once this data is out, the arbitrage opportunity should be automatically calculated. With such a large price difference on both sides, not taking advantage of it would be a disservice to your own wallet.

View OriginalReply0