2026-01-02 12:23:21

⚠️ Project Risk Warning

Recently, a crypto project worth caution has been identified. Through in-depth research into its background, we found clear red flags: team members have a history of repeatedly operating similar projects, which is a typical characteristic of "farmer" operation models.

Such teams often adopt repetitive project launch strategies, leveraging information asymmetry with new participants to profit. If you are considering this project, it is strongly recommended to conduct thorough due diligence first, especially to understand the project's background and previous projects involved.

In the crypto market, team background checks are often more critical than the project whitepaper. Stay vigilant, do your homework, and avoid falling into traps.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

nft_widow

· 3h ago

Same old tricks, I've seen it too many times. Farmer teams just play like this, switching to a new white paper to keep scamming. --- Damn, consecutive operations on similar projects? Isn't this just the standard rug template? Need to check. --- Doing homework is really important. I used to jump in without checking the team background... --- I hate teams with this kind of history the most. It's always the same old wine in a new bottle, just changing the name to keep deceiving. --- Team review > White paper. That's spot on. Too many people only look at glossy project proposals. --- The red flags are so obvious, and people still jump in? I really can't understand it. --- The most disgusting thing about farmer teams is using new little guys as cannon fodder. It must be taken seriously. --- Information asymmetry is definitely their weapon, so you have to dig it out yourself. --- Hey, is this project that... never mind, can't say, it's complicated. --- Another one to avoid the pit. Thanks for the reminder, I'll note down the list.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropBlackHole

· 3h ago

It's the same old story, seen through... The team repeatedly pulls the rug, no matter how fancy the white paper is.

View OriginalReply0

ForumMiningMaster

· 3h ago

This repeated pattern of cutting leeks is really too old; we must dig into the background. --- Same old story? Checking their previous projects will make everything clear. --- Oh no, another farmer team, hurry and disperse. --- Team background checks are really more useful than whitepapers. I only realized this after being burned. --- Damn, these people are just copying and pasting projects, changing the name to continue scamming. --- So what did the founder of this project do before? The routines all seem the same. --- You must do your homework, or you'll really get scammed. Believe it or not. --- It looks very suspicious; teams that keep doing these kinds of projects can't be trusted.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractPlumber

· 3h ago

It's the same old trick. The team background is exposed as soon as you dig into it. They didn't clean up the contract code permissions before running away. Too amateur.

View OriginalReply0

CoffeeNFTs

· 3h ago

It's the same old trick again, the team keeps running away and changing disguises. Looking at their background is the real thing; that pile of stuff in the white paper should have been discarded long ago.

View OriginalReply0