There's a common complaint circulating: vesting destroys liquidity. But here's the catch—it only becomes a problem when the vesting mechanism itself is locked up and illiquid.

The real issue emerges when token holders face a dilemma: wait out a rigid vesting schedule or accept massive slippage dumping on the open market. Neither option is great.

What if vesting itself became tradeable?

Take the tokenized vesting approach gaining traction in Web3. When vesting rights are structured as transferable NFTs, the entire dynamic shifts. Holders aren't forced into an all-or-nothing choice anymore. Instead of rushing to dump tokens the moment locks expire, participants can trade their vesting positions on secondary markets, whether they need liquidity now or prefer to hold.

This isn't just a liquidity band-aid. It fundamentally reframes how token distribution works—moving from rigid lockups to flexible financial instruments. Whether it's early investors, team members, or advisors, everyone gains optionality without sacrificing project stability.

The question isn't whether vesting kills liquidity. It's whether your vesting infrastructure was designed with liquidity in mind from day one.