Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
The biggest issue with RWA is not asset tokenization or bringing assets on-chain; high-quality assets are not rare, what’s scarce is liquidity.
Currently, the most successful on-chain RWA are all US Treasuries, money market funds, and short-term credit.
Why? Not because they need to be tokenized the most, but because they are the easiest to sell and settle.
This is called efficiency capture, not market transformation.
Assets that truly need RWA are a building with only 10% equity sold, a research patent not yet in clinical trials, a non-standardized, illiquid private credit with no secondary market.
The problem with these assets is never that they are “not valuable,” but that selling them is too slow, too expensive, and too difficult.
In the real world, a private asset transaction due diligence takes 3–6 months, with fees starting at 5–10%, intermediary cuts of 15–30%, and deals are not guaranteed to close. Under this structure, assets don’t just become less liquid over time—they are directly frozen.
Therefore, the next phase of RWA products is not just moving larger-scale US Treasuries on-chain, but building a market microstructure infrastructure stack that can decompose these frictions.
Use SPV/trust to transfer rights and atomize legal ownership for T+0 settlement; replace CLOB with RFQ/cycle bidding mechanisms to solve discovery for non-homogeneous assets; use oracles/audits to anchor verification data into a reusable single source of truth; embed compliance modules to reduce marginal entry costs to near zero—and acknowledge a more realistic path:
The liquidity of long-tail assets is often achieved through collateralized lending (liquidity via leverage), not frequent secondary trading (otherwise, paper liquidity would appear).
This is also why the significance of the on-chain global settlement layer becomes concrete here.
It’s not about who can issue more assets, but about who can connect law—data—identity—transaction microstructures into a scalable clearing network, enabling transactions/financing that originally took months and consumed 5–30% friction costs to start having instant settlement and composability.
Tokenizing US Treasuries is about pipeline acceptance; tokenizing long-tail assets is about pipeline commercialization.
And if networks like Sei, centered on low-latency and high-certainty settlement, can truly turn matching/execution/data availability and compliance components into reusable standards according to their roadmap, then their victory won’t be today’s TVL, but the most critical clearing backbone when dead capital is revived tomorrow.