2025-12-24 17:20:38

As Christmas approaches, here's an interesting observation for a casual chat—

Most people are watching the price fluctuations of $BREV, but my focus is elsewhere: what exactly is this token doing in the Brevis ecosystem?

It's actually quite straightforward. The zero-knowledge proof computation network built by Brevis is not just for show. The entire process is clear: when developers need on-chain computation services, they purchase computing power with $BREV. Prover nodes are responsible for running proof generation tasks, and finally settle costs using $BREV. The specific price? Determined by market participants through bidding, with supply and demand taking the lead.

Want to participate as a Prover and take on tasks? The only prerequisite is to stake $BREV into the system. What does this design imply? The token is not only a medium of exchange but also a core driver for ecosystem credit guarantees and resource allocation.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DaoResearcher

· 4h ago

According to the token economics model in the white paper, this staking mechanism essentially addresses the longstanding issue of incentive incompatibility... It is worth noting that the Prover's entry threshold is directly tied to the $BREV holdings, which in 90% of distributed systems would lead to centralization risks.

View OriginalReply0

RektButStillHere

· 4h ago

Haha, finally someone has figured it out—it's not just the retail mentality of only looking at K-line charts. The staking mechanism is so strict that it directly locks out speculators; only those who truly participate can make money. This is what real ecosystem vitality looks like, unlike some coins that are just air.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropFreedom

· 4h ago

Ha, finally someone sees through this layer of window paper. The staking system is indeed ruthless. The logic of computing power bidding is no different from traditional cloud services; it's just wrapped in a different chain shell. It still depends on the actual demand within the ecosystem. Price fluctuations are superficial; the key is to look at the participation level and task volume of Prover nodes. Otherwise, it just becomes a playground for worthless coins. This design approach is actually intended to make $BREV truly circulate; otherwise, relying solely on hype will eventually lead to decline.

View OriginalReply0

MechanicalMartel

· 4h ago

Wow, finally someone sees this clearly... Most people are really just playing the "guess the price game" and haven't thought about how the tokens actually circulate within the system. Staking = credit endorsement, this design is indeed ingenious... but I still want to see if the actual economics of the Prover nodes can run smoothly. This is true utility, much more hardcore than those "we have an application" air projects.

View OriginalReply0

MevTears

· 4h ago

Staking $BREV to get work? Basically, it's a disguised way of fundraising, but the logic is somewhat interesting. I'm already tired of those who only know how to hype the price; finally, someone is talking about practical use cases. The Prover bidding system sounds a bit like a labor market, but who can guarantee that the tokens won't keep crashing? The real question is whether the computing power demand in the ecosystem can keep up. Otherwise, even the best mechanism is useless. This is the essence of Web3: using money to maintain order, and then that money gets cut off.

View OriginalReply0

ShamedApeSeller

· 4h ago

It's still the same staking logic, and it doesn't seem to have any new ideas... However, I have to admit that $BREV ties the token's utility quite tightly, at least it's not just a pure hype play.

View OriginalReply0

GraphGuru