2025-12-23 09:50:47

#数字资产市场洞察 BTC is still in a volatile and tense situation. The 90K level has attempted to break through several times, but ultimately has not been able to hold above — this kind of situation is actually quite common, with a failure rate of up to 80% for breakouts at the top of the range.

Looking at the current situation, the bears are gaining strength and may continue to push the price lower, targeting the lower boundary of the range. Friends looking to buy the dip need to show some patience and not rush in. Consider entering long positions once we reach the 85 level, as the opportunity will be clearer then. At this moment, observe > act.

BTC-0.42%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MEVictim

· 12-23 10:19

90K can't be broken, it just can't. Stop trading, let's talk again at 85.

View OriginalReply0

BloodInStreets

· 12-23 10:17

After so many failures at 90K, it really is a routine operation in the market. Those brothers who are eager to buy the dip will have to endure another wave of sell with bearish market pain this time.

View OriginalReply0

GlueGuy

· 12-23 10:12

If 90K can't be broken, it means it wasn't intended to be broken. Rather than waiting for 85, I want to see how far the short positions can push it.

View OriginalReply0

FrontRunFighter

· 12-23 10:03

90k rejection screams manipulation tbh... classic liquidity grab before the real dump. they're shaking out retail at resistance then gonna flash crash to 85k to liquidate longs. seen this dark forest play a thousand times ngl

Reply0

PessimisticOracle

· 12-23 10:00

If 90K can't be broken, then it can't be broken. Repeated attempts just can't find the way up; this time, the short positions are going to make a strong push.

View OriginalReply0